九州大学 研究者情報
研究者情報 (研究者の方へ)入力に際してお困りですか?
基本情報 研究活動 教育活動 社会活動
吉川 顕正(よしかわ あきまさ) データ更新日:2019.06.24

准教授 /  理学研究院 地球惑星科学部門 流体圏・宇宙圏科学


主な研究テーマ
移動性局所性電離層対流による電離圏起源のオーロラ爆発現象の研究
キーワード:多圏間結合、数理科学
2016.04~2020.03.
極域から磁気赤道域を連結する全球Cowlingチャンネルの実証的研究
キーワード:多圏間結合、数理科学
2012.04~2017.05.
数理多圏間結合科学
キーワード:多圏間結合、数理科学
2010.03~2014.05.
3次元Cowlingシステムの研究
キーワード:三次元電流系、Hall電流発散、Sq、オーロラジェット電流
2007.05~2010.04.
グローバル磁気圏電離圏結合シミュレータによるサブトームの再現と、発現機構の解明
キーワード:磁気圏電離圏結合、サブストーム、シミュレーション、数理物理学
2008.05~2013.04.
磁気嵐シミュレータの開発
キーワード:磁気嵐、グローバルシミュレーション、多圏間結合
2005.03~2007.03.
ジオ・スペースにおける3次元電流系の解明
キーワード:ジオスペース,宇宙天気,3次元電流系,グローバル,CPMN, MAGDAS
2002.04~2010.03.
非一様-複合系の物理学具現の場としての惑星間空間電磁結合系の研究
キーワード:複合系,階層間結合,磁気圏電離圏結合
2000.04~2011.03.
FM-CWレーダと磁場ネットワークデータの比較解析研究
キーワード:HFドップラー,電離層電場,磁気嵐,電離層電流,電離圏物理学
2000.04~2010.03.
多種イオン・電子プラズマ系における磁気圏物理学の展開
キーワード:水星磁気圏,,惑星磁気圏,磁気圏電離圏結合,比較惑星学,宇宙探査
2002.04~2011.03.
磁気流体波動と電離層の相互作用の研究
キーワード:Hall効果,磁気圏電離圏結合,エネルギー収支,沿磁力線電流,誘導結合
2000.04~2011.03.
従事しているプロジェクト研究
MAGDAS/CPMN多点ネットワーク観測による全球結合系に於けるエネルギー・物質輸送の解明
2013.06~2022.03, 代表者:吉川顕正, 九州大学 理学研究院地球惑星科学部門, 九州大学(日本)
地球規模の磁場・電場多点観測網を整備する事により、ジオスペースにおける様々な擾乱現象の解明を行う.
超高層大気長期変動の全球地上ネットワーク観測・研究(IUGONET)
2009.04~2022.03, 代表者:家森俊彦(議長), 京都大学, 東北大学(日本)
国立極研究所(日本)
名古屋大学(日本)
京都大学(日本)
九州大学(日本)
IUGONETは超高層大気を取得している5研究機関が連携して、観測データからメタデータを抽出するための、システム、ソフトウエアを開発しするとともに、全球規模で起こる超高層大気諸現象の解明に貢献する研究推進基盤の構築と共に、分野横断的な研究の促進を目指します。.
太陽地球結合系解明の研究基盤形成(マスタープラン重点課題採択)
2014.04~2024.03, 代表者:津田 敏隆, 京都大学・生存圏研究所, 京都大学・生存圏研究所(日本)
極域、赤道域に大型レーダを配備し、地球規模の磁場・電場多点観測網を整備する事により、極域から赤道域にわたるエネルギー・物質輸送のプロセスを理解する。.
全球Cowlingチャンネルの実証的研究
2012.04~2022.03, 代表者:吉川顕正, 九州大学, 九州大学(日本)
太陽活動現象と同期して発現する、極域から磁気赤道域を連結する全球Cowling電流系の存在を理論・数値実験・データ解析のそれぞれの立場から実証的に検証するプロジェクトである。
吉川は理論研究と観測ネットワークのコーディネーションを主担として、本プロジェクトを統括する。.
木星探査プロジェクト
2008.05~2013.05, 代表者:笠羽康正, 東北大学, JAXA/ISAS(日本)
JAXA/ESA共同で打ち上げる予定の木星探査衛星に於ける科学的探査についてのプロジェクトチームである。.
水星探査プロジェクト共同研究
2002.05~2013.05, 代表者:藤本正樹, JAXA/ISAS, JAXA/ISAS(日本)
JAXA/ESA共同で打ち上げる予定の水星探査衛星「BeppiColombo」に於ける科学的探査についてのプロジェクトチームである。.
スイス国際宇宙科学研究所「国際科学者チーム」:Study for Inductive-3D Ionosphere
2007.04~2008.03, 代表者:共同代表: Olaf Amm, A.Yoshikawa, FInishi meteorological Insitute, Kyushu University, Switzerland
宇宙科学に携わる、新進気鋭の研究者10名が、2005-2006年度にかけて、スイス宇宙科学研究所に終結し、各年度2週間ずつの集中meetingを行い、未だ未知領域である電離圏三次元構造の誘導的な振る舞いを調べる為の研究方策を策定し、その成果を文献としてまとめ将来の方向性を世に問う為のプロジェクトである。2007年度はこの成果報告作成の為の編集会議を行った。.
リアルタイム宇宙天気シミュレータの開発
2004.04~2010.03, 代表者:田中高史, 九州大学理学研究院, 九州大学(日本)
太陽監視衛星によって取得された、太陽風データを入力値として、地球磁気圏の擾乱現象をリアルタイムで再現する宇宙天気シミュレータを開発する.
MAGDAS/CPMN多点ネットワーク観測による地球磁気圏の研究
1996.04~2022.05, 代表者:湯元清文, 九州大学宙空環境研究センター, 九州大学(日本)
地球規模の磁場・電場多点観測網を整備する事により、ジオスペースにおける様々な擾乱現象の解明を行う.
研究業績
主要著書
1. Akimasa Yoshikawa, Ryoichi Fujii, Earth's ionosphere
Theory and phenomenology of cowling channels
, wiley, 10.1002/9781119324522.ch25, 427-443, 2018.04, [URL], The Cowling channel is a generic name of a current system forming inside a high conductivity band in which a secondary polarization electric field modifies the current flow. The polarization field is excited when a divergent part of Hall current driven by the primary electric field is prevented from flowing out to the magnetosphere as the field-aligned current. The purpose of this chapter is to review the recent development of the Cowling channel model. Recent work provides an extension of the theoretical description of the classical Cowling channel with respect to the following aspects: (1) taking into account the 3D nature of the ionosphere by introducing two current layers at different altitudes, and (2) considering finite length of the Cowling channel by introducing a conductance boundary not only at the meridional borders of the Cowling channel, but also at its zonal boundaries. Using this improved model, we discuss current closure and the energy principle for evolution of the Cowling channel. Energy flow inside the Cowling channel and impact of the polarization effect on Joule dissipation in the more general M-I coupling scheme are also provided. We also clarify how shear Alfvén waves interact to the Cowling channel and their application to the global magnetosphere- ionosphere coupling simulations..
2. Yoshikawa A. and R. Fujii, Earth’s Ionosphere: Theory and Phenomenology of Cowling Channels, in Electric Currents in Geospace and Beyond, John Wiley & Sons, Inc, Hoboken, N.J., doi: 10.1002/9781119324522.ch25, 2018.04, The Cowling channel is a generic name of a current system forming inside a high conductivity band, in which a secondary polarization electric field modifies the current flow. The polarization field is excited when a divergent part of Hall current driven by the primary electric field is prevented from flowing out to the magnetosphere as the field-aligned current (FAC).
The Cowling effect is now well known as enhancement of current flow in the direction of the primary electric field by the secondary Hall current [Chapman, 1956]. The Cowling effect was first investigated by Cowling [1932] in connection with the solar atmosphere. The generation mechanism [Cowling and Boreger, 1948] was adopted to account for equatorial electrojet [Hirono, 1950, Untied, 1967] and auroral electrojet [Boström, 1964]. The Cowling effect has been investigated theoretically and observationally [e.g., Baujohann, 1983; Yasuhara et al., 1985; Haerendel, 2008, Amm et al., [2008]; Amm and Fujii, 2008; Marghitu et al., 2011].
Figure 1 shows traditional picture of two-dimensional Cowling channel model elongated along east-west direction [e.g., Baumjohann, 1983], in which ionospheric Hall and Pedersen conductivity are height-integrated. The primary westward electric field (E1) drives northward Hall current and westward Pedersen current. The southward secondary field (E2) is generated so that the Pedersen current closes the primary Hall current between the conductivity gradients. The secondary Hall current flows in the same direction as the primary Pedersen current and forms the electrojet system.
Generally, it is difficult to specify polarization effects in the ionosphere from ground-based data alone. These data only allow to infer the resultant total electrodynamic fields, but cannot track back the chain of cause and consequence that led to the physical situation which then causes these observed total fields. Thus, using ground-based data alone in most cases we can only state whether an observed situation is consistent or not with the expectations from an “active” polarization effect.
To quantify the Cowling effect, we need to know the relative strength of the polarization electric field to total electric field and to what extent it cancels (closes) the primary Hall current. This problem is complementary to the question: How much curl-free Hall current flows out to the magnetosphere as FAC?
In order to reply to this problem provided by Amm et al., [2008], modeling of Cowling channel has been further developed.
To describe the Cowling channel, Amm et al., [2011] and Fujii et al., [2011] introduce a parameter called the Cowling efficiency. It is defined as a ratio how much of Hall current is confined inside the ionosphere by the secondary Pedersen current excited by the polarization electric field. Definition of Cowling efficiency is practically important. It provides a general way to calculate quantitatively the polarization electric field, if the Cowling efficiency, the conductance, and either primary or the total electric fields are known [Amm et al., 2013].
It has been suggested that to identify the Cowling efficiency for specific phenomenon, one needs to know the impedance of the magnetospheric circuit, which completes the current circuit in the M-I system via FAC [e.g., Fujii et al., 2011]. However, it is questionable to assign a magnetospheric impedance for steady state because the M-I system is always changing dynamically.
The M-I coupling process via shear Alfven waves has been used to investigate the nonstationary FAC closure by ionospheric conducting current [e.g., Scholer, 1970]. Assuming specific electric field configurations of an incident wave, Glaβmeier [1983] and Itonaga and Kitamura [1988] have shown that a secondary polarization field due to gradients of Hall conductance can appear in the reflected wave. Actually, the Alfven wave approach can be used to describe not only local and dynamical phenomena but also more generally global quasi-static M-I coupling processes [Yoshikawa et al., 2010]. Therefore it is very important to understand the how the shear Alfven wave interacts with the Cowling channel.
Yoshikawa et al., [2011a] give a general theory about M-I coupling, independent of specific geometries or specific situations. This theory, based on the Alfven waves used in a way of a basis function for the M-I coupling process, is later applied in Yoshikawa et al., [2013a] and Yoshikawa et al., [2013b] specifically to a Cowling channel situation, but can be applied for any general case.
Most of Cowling channel models introduced so far rely on a thin-sheet ionosphere [e.g., Baujohann, 1983]. However, in a realistic ionospheric E-layer, a vertical distribution of the Pedersen conductivity and Hall conductivity has maximum peak around 125 km altitude and around 110 km altitude, respectively [e.g., Richmond and Thayer, 2000]. In order properly consider the ionospheric current closure, one also takes into account the ionospheric thickness [Amm et al., 2008]. One step in this direction is to assume that the Pedersen and Hall current flow thin layers at different altitudes [Fujii et al., 2011; Amm et al., 2011; Yoshikawa et al., 2011].
The classical picture illustrated in Figure 1 describes divergence-free approximation of auroral electrojet. However, a longitudinal boarder of Cowling channel is also important for considering finite aurora arc formation and Harang reversal region [Harang, 1947; Heppner, 1972; Marghitu et al., 2011], where the auroral electrojet is diverging.
Amm et al., [2008] give a review of the work available in the literature until 2008 regarding following aspects of ionospheric electrodynamics and Magnetosphere-Ionosphere (M-I) coupling:
-Polarization effect in the ionosphere (often referred to as “Cowling effect)”
-Inductive effect in the ionosphere
-The effect of the three-dimensional (3D) nature of the ionosphere for ionospheric electrodynamics
-The consequences of the above mentioned aspects to M-I coupling.
Marghitu, [2012] provides an excellent review for auroral arc electrodynamics, by considering the 1D thin uniform arc, the 2D thick uniform arc, and the non-uniform arc. The various arc features are assembled together in a tentative 3D arc model.
The purpose of this chapter is to review the recent development of Cowling channel model after Amm et al., [2008] and Marghitu, [2012]. Recent work provide an extension of theoretical description of the classical Cowling channel with respect to the following aspects: 1) Taking into account the 3D nature of ionosphere by introducing two current layers at different altitudes, and 2) considering finite length of the Cowling channel by introducing a conductance boundary not only at the meridional borders of Cowling channel, but also at its zonal boundaries. Using this improved model, schematically illustrated in Figure 2 with Cowling efficiency description, we discuss current closure and their energy principle for evolution of Cowling channel. Energy flow inside the Cowling channel and impact of polarization effect on Joule dissipation in more general M-I coupling scheme are also provided. In addition, we also clarify how shear Alfven wave interacts to the Cowling channel and their application to the global magnetosphere-ionosphere coupling simulations..
3. Lysak, R. L. and A. Yoshikawa, Resonant Cavities and Waveguides in the Ionosphere and Atmosphere, Magnetospheric ULF Waves: Synthesis and New Directions, AGU, Washington, D. C., Geophys. Monogr. Ser., vol. 169., edited by K. Takahashi, P. J. Chi, R. E. Denton, and R. L. Lysak, pp. 289-306, 2006.12.
主要原著論文
1. Kanako Seki, Yoshizumi Miyoshi, Yusuke Ebihara, Yuto Katoh, Takanobu Amano, Shinji Saito, Masafumi Shoji, Aoi Nakamizo, Kunihiro Keika, Tomoaki Hori, Shin ya Nakano, Shigeto Watanabe, Kei Kamiya, Naoko Takahashi, Yoshiharu Omura, Masahito Nose, Mei Ching Fok, Takashi Tanaka, Akimasa Ieda, Akimasa Yoshikawa, Theory, modeling, and integrated studies in the Arase (ERG) project, Earth, Planets and Space, 10.1186/s40623-018-0785-9, 70, 1, 2018.04, [URL], Understanding of underlying mechanisms of drastic variations of the near-Earth space (geospace) is one of the current focuses of the magnetospheric physics. The science target of the geospace research project Exploration of energization and Radiation in Geospace (ERG) is to understand the geospace variations with a focus on the relativistic electron acceleration and loss processes. In order to achieve the goal, the ERG project consists of the three parts: the Arase (ERG) satellite, ground-based observations, and theory/modeling/integrated studies. The role of theory/modeling/integrated studies part is to promote relevant theoretical and simulation studies as well as integrated data analysis to combine different kinds of observations and modeling. Here we provide technical reports on simulation and empirical models related to the ERG project together with their roles in the integrated studies of dynamic geospace variations. The simulation and empirical models covered include the radial diffusion model of the radiation belt electrons, GEMSIS-RB and RBW models, CIMI model with global MHD simulation REPPU, GEMSIS-RC model, plasmasphere thermosphere model, self-consistent wave–particle interaction simulations (electron hybrid code and ion hybrid code), the ionospheric electric potential (GEMSIS-POT) model, and SuperDARN electric field models with data assimilation. ERG (Arase) science center tools to support integrated studies with various kinds of data are also briefly introduced.[Figure not available: see fulltext.]..
2. Yoshikawa A., and R. Fujii, Earth’s Ionosphere: Theory and Phenomenology of Cowling Channels, Electric Currents in Geospace and Beyond (eds A. Keiling, O. Marghitu, and M. Wheatland), John Wiley & Sons, Inc, Hoboken, N.J.,, doi: 10.1002/9781119324522.ch25, 2018.01, The Cowling channel is a generic name of a current system forming inside a high conductivity band, in which a secondary polarization electric field modifies the current flow. The polarization field is excited when a divergent part of Hall current driven by the primary electric field is prevented from flowing out to the magnetosphere as the field-aligned current (FAC).
The Cowling effect is now well known as enhancement of current flow in the direction of the primary electric field by the secondary Hall current [Chapman, 1956]. The Cowling effect was first investigated by Cowling [1932] in connection with the solar atmosphere. The generation mechanism [Cowling and Boreger, 1948] was adopted to account for equatorial electrojet [Hirono, 1950, Untied, 1967] and auroral electrojet [Boström, 1964]. The Cowling effect has been investigated theoretically and observationally [e.g., Baujohann, 1983; Yasuhara et al., 1985; Haerendel, 2008, Amm et al., [2008]; Amm and Fujii, 2008; Marghitu et al., 2011].
Figure 1 shows traditional picture of two-dimensional Cowling channel model elongated along east-west direction [e.g., Baumjohann, 1983], in which ionospheric Hall and Pedersen conductivity are height-integrated. The primary westward electric field (E1) drives northward Hall current and westward Pedersen current. The southward secondary field (E2) is generated so that the Pedersen current closes the primary Hall current between the conductivity gradients. The secondary Hall current flows in the same direction as the primary Pedersen current and forms the electrojet system.
Generally, it is difficult to specify polarization effects in the ionosphere from ground-based data alone. These data only allow to infer the resultant total electrodynamic fields, but cannot track back the chain of cause and consequence that led to the physical situation which then causes these observed total fields. Thus, using ground-based data alone in most cases we can only state whether an observed situation is consistent or not with the expectations from an “active” polarization effect.
To quantify the Cowling effect, we need to know the relative strength of the polarization electric field to total electric field and to what extent it cancels (closes) the primary Hall current. This problem is complementary to the question: How much curl-free Hall current flows out to the magnetosphere as FAC?
In order to reply to this problem provided by Amm et al., [2008], modeling of Cowling channel has been further developed.
To describe the Cowling channel, Amm et al., [2011] and Fujii et al., [2011] introduce a parameter called the Cowling efficiency. It is defined as a ratio how much of Hall current is confined inside the ionosphere by the secondary Pedersen current excited by the polarization electric field. Definition of Cowling efficiency is practically important. It provides a general way to calculate quantitatively the polarization electric field, if the Cowling efficiency, the conductance, and either primary or the total electric fields are known [Amm et al., 2013].
It has been suggested that to identify the Cowling efficiency for specific phenomenon, one needs to know the impedance of the magnetospheric circuit, which completes the current circuit in the M-I system via FAC [e.g., Fujii et al., 2011]. However, it is questionable to assign a magnetospheric impedance for steady state because the M-I system is always changing dynamically.
The M-I coupling process via shear Alfven waves has been used to investigate the nonstationary FAC closure by ionospheric conducting current [e.g., Scholer, 1970]. Assuming specific electric field configurations of an incident wave, Glaβmeier [1983] and Itonaga and Kitamura [1988] have shown that a secondary polarization field due to gradients of Hall conductance can appear in the reflected wave. Actually, the Alfven wave approach can be used to describe not only local and dynamical phenomena but also more generally global quasi-static M-I coupling processes [Yoshikawa et al., 2010]. Therefore it is very important to understand the how the shear Alfven wave interacts with the Cowling channel.
Yoshikawa et al., [2011a] give a general theory about M-I coupling, independent of specific geometries or specific situations. This theory, based on the Alfven waves used in a way of a basis function for the M-I coupling process, is later applied in Yoshikawa et al., [2013a] and Yoshikawa et al., [2013b] specifically to a Cowling channel situation, but can be applied for any general case.
Most of Cowling channel models introduced so far rely on a thin-sheet ionosphere [e.g., Baujohann, 1983]. However, in a realistic ionospheric E-layer, a vertical distribution of the Pedersen conductivity and Hall conductivity has maximum peak around 125 km altitude and around 110 km altitude, respectively [e.g., Richmond and Thayer, 2000]. In order properly consider the ionospheric current closure, one also takes into account the ionospheric thickness [Amm et al., 2008]. One step in this direction is to assume that the Pedersen and Hall current flow thin layers at different altitudes [Fujii et al., 2011; Amm et al., 2011; Yoshikawa et al., 2011].
The classical picture illustrated in Figure 1 describes divergence-free approximation of auroral electrojet. However, a longitudinal boarder of Cowling channel is also important for considering finite aurora arc formation and Harang reversal region [Harang, 1947; Heppner, 1972; Marghitu et al., 2011], where the auroral electrojet is diverging.
Amm et al., [2008] give a review of the work available in the literature until 2008 regarding following aspects of ionospheric electrodynamics and Magnetosphere-Ionosphere (M-I) coupling:
-Polarization effect in the ionosphere (often referred to as “Cowling effect)”
-Inductive effect in the ionosphere
-The effect of the three-dimensional (3D) nature of the ionosphere for ionospheric electrodynamics
-The consequences of the above mentioned aspects to M-I coupling.
Marghitu, [2012] provides an excellent review for auroral arc electrodynamics, by considering the 1D thin uniform arc, the 2D thick uniform arc, and the non-uniform arc. The various arc features are assembled together in a tentative 3D arc model.
The purpose of this chapter is to review the recent development of Cowling channel model after Amm et al., [2008] and Marghitu, [2012]. Recent work provide an extension of theoretical description of the classical Cowling channel with respect to the following aspects: 1) Taking into account the 3D nature of ionosphere by introducing two current layers at different altitudes, and 2) considering finite length of the Cowling channel by introducing a conductance boundary not only at the meridional borders of Cowling channel, but also at its zonal boundaries. Using this improved model, schematically illustrated in Figure 2 with Cowling efficiency description, we discuss current closure and their energy principle for evolution of Cowling channel. Energy flow inside the Cowling channel and impact of polarization effect on Joule dissipation in more general M-I coupling scheme are also provided. In addition, we also clarify how shear Alfven wave interacts to the Cowling channel and their application to the global magnetosphere-ionosphere coupling simulations..
3. Akimasa Yoshikawa, Akiko Fujimoto, Akihiro Ikeda, Teiji Uozumi, Shuji Abe, Monitoring of Space and Earth electromagnetic environment by MAGDAS project
Collaboration with IKIR-Introduction to ICSWSE/MAGDAS project, E3S Web of Conferences, 10.1051/e3sconf/20172001013, 20, 2017.10, [URL], For study of coupling processes in the Solar-Terrestrial System, International Center for Space Weather Science and Education (ICSWSE), Kyushu University has developed a real time magnetic data acquisition system (the MAGDAS project) around the world. The number of observational sites is increasing every year with the collaboration of host countries. Now at this time, the MAGDAS Project has installed 78 real time magnetometers-so it is the largest magnetometer array in the world. The history of global observation at Kyushu University is over 30 years and number of developed observational sites is over 140. Especially, Collaboration between IKIR is extended back to 1990's. Now a time, we are operating Flux-gate magnetometer and FM-CW Radar. It is one of most important collaboration for space weather monitoring. By using MAGDAS data, ICSWSE produces many types of space weather index, such as EE-index (for monitoring long tern and shot term variation of equatorial electrojet), Pc5 index (for monitoring solar-wind velocity and high energy electron flux), Sq-index (for monitoring global change of ionospheric low and middle latitudinal current system), and Pc3 index (for monitoring of plasma density variation at low latitudes). In this report, we will introduce recent development of MAGDAS/ICSWSE Indexes project and topics for new open policy for MAGDAS data will be also discussed..
4. S. Imajo, Akimasa Yoshikawa, T. Uozumi, Shin Ohtani, A. Nakamizo, P. J. Chi, Application of a global magnetospheric-ionospheric current model for dayside and terminator Pi2 pulsations, Journal of Geophysical Research, 10.1002/2017JA024246, 122, 8, 8589-8603, 2017.08, [URL], Pi2 magnetic oscillations on the dayside are considered to be produced by the ionospheric current that is driven by Pi2-associated electric fields from the high-latitude region, but this idea has not been quantitatively tested. The present study numerically tested the magnetospheric-ionospheric current system for Pi2 consisting of field-aligned currents (FACs) localized in the nightside auroral region, the perpendicular magnetospheric current flowing in the azimuthal direction, and horizontal ionospheric currents driven by the FACs. We calculated the spatial distribution of the ground magnetic field produced by these currents using the Biot-Savart law in a stationary state. The calculated magnetic field reproduced the observational features reported by previous studies: (1) the sense of the H component does not change a wide range of local time sectors at low latitudes, (2) the amplitude of the H component on the dayside is enhanced at the equator, (3) the D component reverses its phase near the dawn and dusk terminators, (4) the meridian of the D component phase reversal near the dusk terminator is shifted more sunward than that near the dawn terminator, and (5) the amplitude of the D component in the morning is larger than that in the early evening. We also derived the global distributions of observed equivalent currents for two Pi2 events. The spatial patterns of dayside equivalent currents were similar to the spatial pattern of numerically derived equivalent currents. The results indicate that the oscillation of the magnetospheric-ionospheric current system is a plausible explanation of Pi2s on the dayside and near the terminator..
5. S. Ohtani, Akimasa Yoshikawa, The initiation of the poleward boundary intensification of auroral emission by fast polar cap flows
A new interpretation based on ionospheric polarization, Journal of Geophysical Research, 10.1002/2016JA023143, 121, 11, 10,910-10,928, 2016.11, [URL], The auroral intensification at the poleward boundary of the auroral oval is often considered to be the ionospheric manifestation of the distant reconnection. In the present study, however, we propose that the poleward boundary intensifications (PBIs) are initiated by ionospheric polarization due to fast polar cap flows, which are known to be well correlated with PBIs. The current continuity at the ionosphere can be described in two different ways, that is, the reflection of an Alfv�n wave and the closure of Pedersen and Hall currents with field-aligned currents (FACs). The required consistency between the two approaches sets a framework for modeling the ionospheric polarization, and we numerically test the aforementioned idea focusing on an induced upward FAC as indicative of PBIs. The results show that in case the polar cap flow channel approaches the auroral oval perpendicularly from poleward, (i) upward and downward FACs are induced at the poleward boundary to the west and east of the longitudinal center of the flow channel, respectively; (ii) those induced FACs extend much wider in longitude than the flow channel; (iii) the peak densities of those induced FACs are significantly larger than those of the incident FACs; (iv) those induced FACs are distributed almost symmetrically in longitude, indicating that the Pedersen polarization dominates the Hall polarization; and (v) if the polar cap flow inclined dawnward (duskward), an upward (downward) FAC is induced first. These results are consistent with the reported characteristics of PBIs, which are rather difficult to explain otherwise..
6. Toshitaka Tsuda, Mamoru Yamamoto, Hiroyuki Hashiguchi, Kazuo Shiokawa, Yasunobu Ogawa, Satonori Nozawa, Hiroshi Miyaoka, Akimasa Yoshikawa, A proposal on the study of solar-terrestrial coupling processes with atmospheric radars and ground-based observation network, Radio Science, 10.1002/2016RS006035, 51, 9, 1587-1599, 2016.09, [URL], The solar energy can mainly be divided into two categories: the solar radiation and the solar wind. The former maximizes at the equator, generating various disturbances over a wide height range and causing vertical coupling processes of the atmosphere between the troposphere and middle and upper atmospheres by upward propagating atmospheric waves. The energy and material flows that occur in all height regions of the equatorial atmosphere are named as “Equatorial Fountain.” These processes from the bottom also cause various space weather effects, such as satellite communication and Global Navigation Satellite System positioning. While, the electromagnetic energy and high-energy plasma particles in the solar wind converge into the polar region through geomagnetic fields. These energy/particle inflow results in auroral Joule heating and ion drag of the atmosphere particularly during geomagnetic storms and substorms. The ion outflow from the polar ionosphere controls ambient plasma constituents in the magnetosphere and may cause long-term variation of the atmosphere. We propose to clarify these overall coupling processes in the solar-terrestrial system from the bottom and from above through high-resolution observations at key latitudes in the equator and in the polar region. We will establish a large radar with active phased array antenna, called the Equatorial Middle and Upper atmosphere radar, in west Sumatra, Indonesia. We will participate in construction of the EISCAT_3D radar in northern Scandinavia. These radars will enhance the existing international radar network. We will also develop a global observation network of compact radio and optical remote sensing equipment from the equator to polar region..
7. M. G. Cardinal, Akimasa Yoshikawa, Hideaki Kawano, Huixin Liu, Masakazu Watanabe, S. Abe, T. Uozumi, G. Maeda, Tohru Hada, K. Yumoto, Capacity building
A tool for advancing space weather science, Space Weather, 10.1002/2014SW001110, 12, 10, 571-576, 2015.01, [URL].
8. Run Shi, Huixin Liu, Akimasa Yoshikawa, Beichen Zhang, Binbin Ni, Coupling of electrons and inertial Alfven waves in the topside ionosphere, Journal of Geophysical Research, 10.1002/jgra.50355, 118, 6, 2903-2910, 2013.01, [URL], A one-dimensional kinetic model is constructed to simulate the electron acceleration by inertial Alfven waves. The electrons are divided into cold and hot electrons and treated separately. Cold components are described by the fluid equation and hot ones by the Vlasov equation, both carrying field-aligned currents. Intense variation of Alfven speed has been introduced by inclusion of cold electrons. The model results show that the exponential decrease of the plasma density plays a key role, which leads to the sharp gradient of both Alfven velocity and electron inertial length. When Alfven waves encounter this sharp gradient at lower altitudes, the electrons accelerated by the waves become super-Alfvenic, and the width of burst structures becomes much wider than the electron inertial length. Consequently, the background electrons carry the oppositely field-aligned current due to plasma oscillation. It is demonstrated that the current carried by the electrons exceeding the wavefront is balanced by the reverse current carried by background electrons. This mechanism can be used to reasonably explain observations of the electron bursts accompanied by little net field-aligned current. Furthermore, our simulation indicates another type of Alfven wave reflection due to mirror force and wave-particle interaction. Key Points Kinetic model which separates the electrons into cold and hot parts Explain the electron bursts accompanied by little net field-aligned current Another type of Alfven wave reflection due to wave-particle interaction.
9. O. Amm, R. Fujii, Heikki Antero Vanhamaki, Akimasa Yoshikawa, A. Ieda, General solution for calculating polarization electric fields in the auroral ionosphere and application examples, Journal of Geophysical Research, 10.1002/jgra.50254, 118, 5, 2428-2437, 2013.01, [URL], We devise an approach to calculate the polarization electric field in the ionosphere, when the ionospheric conductances, the primary (modeled) or the total (measured) electric field, and the Cowling efficiency are given. In contrast to previous studies, our approach is a general solution which is not limited to specific geometrical setups, and all parameters may have any kind of spatial dependence. The solution technique is based on spherical elementary current (vector) systems (SECS). This way, we avoid the need to specify explicit boundary conditions for the searched polarization electric field of its potential which would be required if the problem was solved in a differential equation approach. Instead, we solve an algebraic matrix equation, and the implicit boundary condition that the divergence of the polarization electric field vanishes outside our analysis area is sufficient. In order to illustrate our theory, we then apply it to two simple models of auroral electrodynamic situations, the first being a mesoscale strong conductance enhancement in the early morning sector within a relatively weak southward primary electric field, and a morning sector auroral arc with only a weak conductance enhancement, but a large southward primary electric field at the poleward flank of the arc. While the significance of the polarization electric field for maximum Cowling efficiency is large for the first case, it is rather minor for the second one. Both models show that the polarization electric field effect may not only change the magnitude of the current systems but also their overall geometry. Furthermore, the polarization electric field may extend into regions where the primary electric field is small, thus even dominating the total electric field in these regions. For the first model case, the total Joule heating integrated over the analysis area decreases by a factor of about 4 for maximum Cowling efficiency as compared to the case of vanishing Cowling efficiency. Furthermore, for this case the resulting total electric field structurally shows a strong resemblance to that frequently observed during auroral omega band events..
10. Akimasa Yoshikawa, O. Amm, Heikki Antero Vanhamaki, R. Fujii, Illustration of Cowling channel coupling to the shear Alfven wave, Journal of Geophysical Research, 10.1002/jgra.50513, 118, 10, 6405-6415, 2013.01, [URL], Decomposition of horizontally extended current system into components in the polarization processes and extraction of Cowling channel defined in the companion paper embedded in the total current system are numerically demonstrated. We successfully visualize the background and polarization components in the magnetosphere-ionosphere coupling process by using the proposed theoretical framework. As a fundamental response, the polarization charge produced by the Pedersen current divergence has a role to cancel and intensify the ambient background electric field inside and outside the high-conductivity band, respectively. In contrast, the polarization charge produced by the Hall current divergence has a role to rotate the electric field from the background electric field, which causes a meandering of ionospheric convection flow along the boundary of a high-conductivity band. The Hall and Pedersen currents are always perpendicular to each other. They never close each other when conductances are homogeneous, but they can do that at the conductivity gradient region. This is the reason why a Hall polarization charge is induced and a resultant Cowling channel is formed. Key Points Illustration of Cowling channel Hall and Pedersen current close each other at the conductivity gradient region Identify the Hall polarization field and Alfven conductance.
11. Akimasa Yoshikawa, O. Amm, Heikki Antero Vanhamaki, A. Nakamizo, R. Fujii, Theory of Cowling channel formation by reflection of shear Alfven waves from the auroral ionosphere, Journal of Geophysical Research, 10.1002/jgra.50514, 118, 10, 6416-6425, 2013.01, [URL], We present the first complete formulation of the coupling between the ionospheric horizontal currents (including Hall currents) and the field-aligned currents (FAC) via shear Alfven waves, which can describe the formation of a Cowling channel without any a priori parameterization of the secondary (Hall polarization) electric field strength. Our theory reorganizes the Cowling channel by "primary" and "secondary" fields. Until now there are no theoretical frameworks, which can derive these separated components from observed or given total conductance, electric field, and FAC distributions alone. But when a given incident where Alfven wave is considered as the driver, the reflected wave can be uniquely decomposed into the primary and secondary components. We show that the reflected wave can, depending on actual conditions, indeed carry FAC that connect to divergent Hall currents. With this new method, we can identify how large the secondary electric field becomes, how efficiently the divergent Hall current is closed within the ionosphere, and how much of the Hall current continues out to the magnetosphere as FAC. In typical ionospheric situations, only a small fraction of FAC is connected to Hall currents at conductance gradients, i.e., the secondary field is relatively strong. But when conductances are relatively low compared with Alfven conductance and/or horizontal scales smaller than ~10 km, the Hall FAC may become significant. Key Points Formation of Cowling channel coupling to the shear Alfven wave Identify the polarization field is generated to close the Hall current Our theory separates the Cowling channel into primary and secondary components.
12. R. Fujii, O. Amm, Heikki Antero Vanhamaki, Akimasa Yoshikawa, A. Ieda, An application of the finite length Cowling channel model to auroral arcs with longitudinal variations, Journal of Geophysical Research, 10.1029/2012JA017953, 117, 11, 2012.12, [URL], A physical process for the latitudinal motion of an auroral arc based on the four-side bound Cowling channel model is proposed. Assuming that an upward field-aligned current (FAC) is associated with the auroral arc that forms a Cowling channel with finite lengths not only latitudinally but also longitudinally and that the upward FAC region is primarily embedded in a purely northward electric field, the primary Hall current driven by the northward electric field accumulates positive excess charges at the eastern edge of the channel and negative charges at the western edge for a perfect or partial Cowling channel with a nonzero Cowling efficiency. The charges produce a westward secondary electric field, indicating that a westward electric field can thus be produced by a purely northward primary electric field. This secondary electric field moves the arc with its magnetospheric source drifting together with the magnetospheric plasmas equatorward and simultaneously produces the electric field outside the channel that moves the downward FAC equatorward of the upward FAC region equatorward together with the upward FAC. Thus, the whole 3-D current system is expected to move equatorward as often observed in the afternoon auroral zone..
13. Heikki Antero Vanhamaki, Akimasa Yoshikawa, O. Amm, R. Fujii, Ionospheric Joule heating and Poynting flux in quasi-static approximation, Journal of Geophysical Research, 10.1029/2012JA017841, 117, 8, 2012.01, [URL], Energy flow is an important aspect of magnetosphere-ionosphere coupling. Electromagnetic energy is transported as Poynting flux from the magnetosphere to the ionosphere, where it is dissipated as Joule heating. Recently Richmond derived an "Equipotential Boundary Poynting Flux (EBPF) theorem", that the Poynting flux within a flux tube whose boundary is an equipotential curve is dissipated inside the ionospheric foot point of the flux tube. In this article we study Richmond's EBPF theorem more closely by considering the curl-free and divergence-free parts as well as the Hall and Pedersen parts of the ionospheric current system separately. Our main findings are that i) divergence-free currents are on average dissipationless, ii) the curl-free Pedersen current is responsible for the whole ionospheric Joule heating and iii) pointwise match between vertical Poynting flux and ionospheric Joule heating is broken by gradients of Hall and Pedersen conductances. Results i) and ii) hold when integrated over the whole ionosphere or any area bounded by an equipotential curve. The present study is limited to quasi-static phenomena. The more general topic of electrodynamic Joule heating and Poynting flux, including inductive effects, will be addressed in a future study..
14. Akimasa Yoshikawa, O. Amm, Heikki Antero Vanhamaki, R. Fujii, A self-consistent synthesis description of magnetosphere-ionosphere coupling and scale-dependent auroral process using shear Alfvén wave, Journal of Geophysical Research, 10.1029/2011JA016460, 116, 8, 2011.01, [URL], In order to correctly describe the dynamical behavior of the magnetosphere-ionosphere (MI) coupling system and the scale-dependent auroral process, we develop a synthesis formulation that combines the process of (1) the inverse Walen separation of MHD disturbance into parallel- and antiparallel-propagating shear Alfvén wave to the ambient magnetic field, (2) the shear Alfvén wave reflection process including (3) the scale-dependent electrostatic coupling process through the linearized Knight relation, (4) two-layer ionosphere model, and (5) dynamic conductance variations. A novel procedure that applies the inverse Walen relation to the incompressional MHD disturbances at the inner boundary of the MHD region enables to extract the component of the shear Alfvén wave incident to the ionosphere. The extracted incident electric field supplies an electromotive force for the generation of the MI coupling system, and the reflected electric field is generated such that it totally satisfies the synthesis MI-coupling equation. A three-dimensional ionospheric current system is represented by a two-layer model in which the Pedersen and the Hall current are confined in the separated layers, which are connected by field-aligned currents driven by the linear current-voltage relation between two layers. Hence, our scheme possibly reproduces two types of the scale-dependent MI-decoupling process of the perpendicular potential structure: due to the parallel potential drop at the auroral acceleration region and the other due to the parallel potential differences inside the ionosphere. Our newly formulation may be well suited for description of scale-dependent auroral process and mesoscale ionospheric electrodynamics interlocked with the dynamical development of magnetospheric processes..
15. O. Amm, R. Fujii, K. Kauristie, A. Aikio, Akimasa Yoshikawa, A. Ieda, Heikki Antero Vanhamaki, A statistical investigation of the Cowling channel efficiency in the auroral zone, Journal of Geophysical Research, 10.1029/2010JA015988, 116, 2, 2011.01, [URL], The Cowling channel mechanism describes the creation of a secondary polarization electric field at sharp conductance boundaries in the ionosphere due to excess charges for the case in which the release of these charges to the magnetosphere is fully or partially impeded. The secondary currents generated by the polarization electric field effectively modify the effective ionospheric conductivity inside the Cowling channel. While the Cowling mechanism is generally accepted for the equatorial electrojet, there is a long-standing discussion about the importance of this mechanism and its efficiency in the auroral electrojet. We present a statistical investigation that enables us to identify the most probable geospace conditions and MLT locations for a high Cowling efficiency. This investigation is based on more than 1600 meridional profiles of data from the Magnetometers-Ionospheric Radars-All-sky Cameras Large Experiment (MIRACLE) network in Scandinavia, in particular, ground magnetic field data from the International Monitor for Auroral Geomagnetic Effects (IMAGE) magnetometer network and electric field data from the Scandinavian Twin Auroral Radar Experiment (STARE) radar, supported with pointwise ionospheric conductance measurements from the European Incoherent Scatter (EISCAT) radar. We analyze the data in the framework of a 3-D ionospheric model, but our data set is filtered so that only electrojet-type situations are included so that the gradients of all measured quantities in longitudinal direction can be neglected. The analysis results in a steep peak of high Cowling channel efficiency probability in the early morning sector (0245-0645 MLT), with the largest probability around 0500 MLT and for medium and high geomagnetic activity. In agreement with an earlier single-event study by Amm and Fujii (2008), this indicates that the Cowling mechanism may be most effective in the early morning part of the central substorm bulge. Further, our analysis results in an almost monotonic increase of the probability of high Cowling channel efficiency with increasing geomagnetic activity..
16. Y. Yamazaki, K. Yumoto, M. G. Cardinal, B. J. Fraser, P. Hattori, Y. Kakinami, J. Y. Liu, K. J.W. Lynn, R. Marshall, D. McNamara, T. Nagatsuma, V. M. Nikiforov, R. E. Otadoy, M. Ruhimat, B. M. Shevtsov, K. Shiokawa, S. Abe, T. Uozumi, Akimasa Yoshikawa, An empirical model of the quiet daily geomagnetic field variation, Journal of Geophysical Research, 10.1029/2011JA016487, 116, 10, 2011.01, [URL], An empirical model of the quiet daily geomagnetic field variation has been constructed based on geomagnetic data obtained from 21 stations along the 210 Magnetic Meridian of the Circum-pan Pacific Magnetometer Network (CPMN) from 1996 to 2007. Using the least squares fitting method for geomagnetically quiet days (Kp ≤ 2+), the quiet daily geomagnetic field variation at each station was described as a function of solar activity SA, day of year DOY, lunar age LA, and local time LT. After interpolation in latitude, the model can describe solar-activity dependence and seasonal dependence of solar quiet daily variations (S) and lunar quiet daily variations (L). We performed a spherical harmonic analysis (SHA) on these S and L variations to examine average characteristics of the equivalent external current systems. We found three particularly noteworthy results. First, the total current intensity of the S current system is largely controlled by solar activity while its focus position is not significantly affected by solar activity. Second, we found that seasonal variations of the S current intensity exhibit north-south asymmetry; the current intensity of the northern vortex shows a prominent annual variation while the southern vortex shows a clear semi-annual variation as well as annual variation. Thirdly, we found that the total intensity of the L current system changes depending on solar activity and season; seasonal variations of the L current intensity show an enhancement during the December solstice, independent of the level of solar activity..
17. R. Fujii, O. Amm, Akimasa Yoshikawa, A. Ieda, Heikki Antero Vanhamaki, Reformulation and energy flow of the Cowling channel, Journal of Geophysical Research, 10.1029/2010JA015989, 116, 2, 2011.01, [URL], The question to which extent the divergence of the Hall current can be connected to the Pedersen current or to the closure current in the magnetosphere through field-aligned currents (FACs), that is, the Cowling channel process in the polar region, has long been debated but not fully understood. The present study reformulates the Cowling channel by introducing a two-layer model consisting of Hall and Pedersen conductivity layers with channel boundaries not only in the direction perpendicular to the channel but also in the direction along it. This new model enables us to better and more physically understand the connection between the Hall current, Pedersen current, and FAC. In particular, the finiteness of the channel along its direction enables us to understand that the primary nonzero electric field along the channel and FACs at the channel boundaries that faced each other in the channel direction carries the necessary energy for the Hall current to set up the secondary electric field from the magnetosphere. A case for a possible connection between the Pedersen and Hall currents is shown based on a polar current system derived from the Kamide-Richmond-Matsushita method. A more comprehensive analysis based on data is presented in the companion paper..
18. Akimasa Yoshikawa, A. Nakamizo, O. Amm, Heikki Antero Vanhamaki, R. Fujii, Y. M. Tanaka, T. Uozumi, K. Yumoto, S. Ohtani, Self-consistent formulation for the evolution of ionospheric conductances at the ionospheric e region within the M-I coupling scheme, Journal of Geophysical Research, 10.1029/2011JA016449, 116, 9, 2011.01, [URL], We formulate the evolution of ionospheric conductivity in the framework of 3-D M-I coupling. Two important physical processes are taken into account. One is the ionization process by precipitating mono-energetic particles, which are accelerated by parallel-potential drops in the auroral acceleration region. The other process reflects the fact that part of field-aligned current (FAC) carried by electrons is closed with a perpendicular ionic current. Here, whereas the electric current is divergence-free, the divergence of electron current is finite. Therefore, the ionospheric electron density changes, and so does the conductivity. If the energy of electron precipitation is below ∼10 eV, this second process plays an important role in plasma transportation, production, and evacuation processes. In this case the density variation does not extend in space at the perpendicular electron velocity, but it rather moves at the ion perpendicular velocity. If the energy of electron precipitation is above ∼1 keV, in contrast, the precipitation has a nonlinear effect on plasma evolution. That is, the propagation speed of the density variation increases with increasing upward-FAC density, and the propagation takes place in the direction of the converging current into the upward FAC region. The Cowling effect on the plasma evolution process is crucially important. Our formulation is more general than the previous studies and is not limited to certain geometries, current component or interaction modes between the ionosphere and magnetosphere. It is therefore better-suited for describing the self-organized M-I coupling system, which evolves with current systems, conductivity, and magnetospheric processes interacting with each other..
19. Tanaka T., A. Nakamizo, A. Yoshikawa , S. Fujita, H. Shinagawa, H. Shimazu, T. Kikuchi, K. Hashimoto, Substorm convection and current system deduced from the global simulation, J. Geophys. Res., 10.1029/2009JA014676, 115, A05220, J. Geophys. Res. 115, A05220, doi:10.1029/2009JA014676, 2010.12.
20. 徳永旭将, 池田大輔, 中村和幸, 樋口知之, 吉川顕正, 魚住禎司, 藤本晶子,森岡昭, 湯元清文, CPMN Group,, 変化点検出を応用した時系列データからの突発現象の前兆検出アルゴリズム, 情報処理学会論文誌「数理モデル化と応用TOM」, 2010.12.
21. Yoshikawa A., H. Nakata, A. Nakamizo, T. Uozumi, M. Itonaga, S. Fujita, K. Yumoto, and T. Tanaka, Alfvenic-coupling algorithm for global and dynamical magnetosphere-ionosphere coupled system, J. Geophys. Res., 10.1029/2009JA014924, 115, A04211, J. Geophys. Res., 115, A04211, doi:10.1029/2009JA014924, 2010.03.
22. Yoshikwa A., H. Nakata, A. Nakamizo, T. Uozumi, M. Itonaga, and K. Yumoto, A new magnetospherere- ionosphere coupling scheme for temporal and global magnetospheric MHD simulations, Mem. Fac. Sci., Kyushu Univ., Ser. D, Earth & Planet.Sci.,Vol, XXXII, No2, 87-94, XXXII, 2, 87-94, Vol, XXXII, No2, 87-94, 2009.03.
23. O. Amm, A. Aruliah, S. C. Buchert, R. Fujii, J. W. Gjerloev, A. Ieda, T. Matsuo, C. Stolle, Heikki Antero Vanhamaki, Akimasa Yoshikawa, Towards understanding the electrodynamics of the 3-dimensional high-latitude ionosphere
Present and future, Annales Geophysicae, 10.5194/angeo-26-3913-2008, 26, 12, 3913-3932, 2008.11, [URL], Traditionally, due to observational constraints, ionospheric modelling and data analysis techniques have been devised either in one dimension (e.g. along a single radar beam), or in two dimensions (e.g. over a network of magnetometers). With new upcoming missions like the Swarm ionospheric multi-satellite project, or the EISCAT 3-D project, the time has come to take into account variations in all three dimensions simultaneously, as they occur in the real ionosphere. The link between ionospheric electrodynamics and the neutral atmosphere circulation which has gained increasing interest in the recent years also intrinsically requires a truly 3-dimensional (3-D) description. In this paper, we identify five major science questions that need to be addressed by 3-D ionospheric modelling and data analysis. We briefly review what proceedings in the young field of 3-D ionospheric electrodynamics have been made in the past to address these selected question, and we outline how these issues can be addressed in the future with additional observations and/or improved data analysis and simulation techniques. Throughout the paper, we limit the discussion to high-latitude and mesoscale ionospheric electrodynamics, and to directly data-driven (not statistical) data analysis..
24. T. Uozumi, K. Yumoto, K. Kitamura, S. Abe, Y. Kakinami, M. Shinohara, Akimasa Yoshikawa, Hideaki Kawano, T. Ueno, T. Tokunaga, D. McNamara, J. K. Ishituka, S. L.G. Dutra, B. Damtie, V. Doumbia, O. Obrou, A. B. Rabiu, I. A. Adimula, M. Othman, M. Fairos, R. E.S. Otadoy, A new index to monitor temporal and long-term variations of the equatorial electrojet by MAGDAS/CPMN real-time data
EE-index, Earth, Planets and Space, 10.1186/BF03352828, 60, 7, 785-790, 2008.01, [URL], A new index, EE-index (EDst, EU, and EL), is proposed to monitor temporal and long-term variations of the equatorial electrojet by using the MAGDAS/CPMN real-time data. The mean value of the H component magnetic variations observed at the nightside (LT = 18-06) MAGDAS/CPMN stations along the magnetic equatorial region is found to show variations similar to those of Dst; we defined this quantity as EDst. The EDst can be used as a proxy of Dst for the real-time and long-term geospace monitoring. By subtracting EDst from the H component data of each equatorial station, ir is possible to extract the Equatorial Electrojet and Counter Electrojetcomponents, which are defined as EU and EL, respectively..
25. Y. M. Tanaka, K. Yumoto, Akimasa Yoshikawa, M. Itonaga, M. Shinohara, S. Takasaki, B. J. Fraser, Horizontal amplitude and phase structure of low-latitude Pc 3 pulsations around the dawn terminator A11308, Journal of Geophysical Research, 10.1029/2007JA012585, 112, 11, 2007.11, [URL], The horizontal spatial structure of Pc 3 pulsations observed at low geomagnetic latitude (22-46°) around dawn is studied statistically using data acquired by the Circum-pan Pacific Magnetometer Network (CPMN). It is found that while the phase of the H component of low-latitude Pc 3 pulsations remains largely unchanged with the passing of dawn, the D component undergoes a phase shift of ca. 180°. This phase variation across dawn is related to the abrupt change in the major axis orientation of polarization ellipses observed in previous studies. Both the H and D components have higher amplitude after dawn than before dawn. This horizontal amplitude and phase structure is well explained by the response of a nonuniform ionosphere around dawn to incident Alfvén waves, where the secondary electric field caused by charge accumulation at the dawn terminator plays an important role in deformation of the current system. Enhancement of the DIH ratio is also observed just after dawn at very low latitudes (22°). As Alfvén waves are not excited efficiently at very low geomagnetic latitudes, including the magnetic equator, the observed horizontal structure in such regions may be due to a large-scale current system originating at higher latitudes..
26. Terumasa Tokunaga, Hiroko Kohta, Akimasa Yoshikawa, Teiji Uozumi, Kiyohumi Yumoto, Global features of Pi 2 pulsations obtained by independent component analysis, Geophysical Research Letters, 10.1029/2007GL030174, 34, 14, 2007.07, [URL], Ground Pi 2 pulsations are mixtures of several components reflecting (1) propagations of fast and shear Alfvén wave, (2) resonances of plasmaspheric/magnetospheric cavity and magnetic field lines, and (3) tansformations to ionospheric current systems. However, it has been unclear how they coupled with each other and how their signals are distributed at different latitudes. The present work is intended to pilot the future possibilities whether we can identify the global system of Pi 2 pulsations by Independent Component Analysis (ICA). We have successfully decomposed an isolated Pi 2 event on a quiet day observed at the CPMN stations into two components. One was the global oscillation that occurs from nightside high to equatorial latitudes with the common waveform and has an amplitude maximum at nightside high latitude. Another component was localized at nightside high latitudes. Its amplitudes were quite weak at low latitudes, but were enhanced near dayside dip equator..
27. R. L. Lysak, Akimasa Yoshikawa, Resonant cavities and waveguides in the ionosphere and atmosphere, Magnetospheric ULF Waves
Synthesis and New Directions, 2006
, 10.1029/169GM19, 289-306, 2006.01, [URL], The strong inhomogeneities in plasma parameters in the ionosphere and adjacent regions can trap waves in the upper end of the ULF range (Pc1/Pi1). The topside ionosphere is characterized by a rapidly increasing Alfvén speed with a scale height on the order of 1000 km. Shear-mode Alfvén waves in this region can be partially trapped at frequencies in the 0.1-1.0 Hz range. The same structure can trap fast-mode compressional waves in this frequency band. Since these waves can propagate across magnetic field lines, this structure constitutes a waveguide in which energy can propagate at speeds comparable to the Alfvén speed, typically on the order of 1000 km/s. Hall effects in the ionosphere couple these two wave modes, so that the introduction of a field-aligned current by means of a shearmode Alfvén wave can excite compressional waves that can propagate in the waveguide. In the limit of infinite ionospheric conductivity, these waves are isolated from the atmospheric fields; however, for finite conductivity, ionospheric and atmospheric waves are coupled. Transverse magnetic modes in the atmosphere can propagate at ULF frequencies and form global Schumann resonances with the fundamental at 8 Hz. It has been suggested that signals that propagate at the speed of light through this atmospheric waveguide can rapidly transmit signals from the polar region to lower latitudes during sudden storm commencements..
28. Yuki Obana, Akimasa Yoshikawa, John V. Olson, Ray J. Morris, Brian J. Fraser, Kiyohumi Yumoto, North-south asymmetry of the amplitude of high-latitude Pc 3-5 pulsations
Observations at conjugate stations, Journal of Geophysical Research, 10.1029/2003JA010242, 110, A10, 2005.10, [URL], The north-south asymmetry of the amplitude of ULF pulsations in the Pc 3-5 band is studied using magnetic field data from the magnetically conjugate stations at L ∼ 5.4: Kotzebue (KOT) in the northern hemisphere and Macquarie Island (MCQ) in the southern hemisphere. We obtained the following results for the northward (H) component of magnetic pulsations: (1) The north to south power ratio shows a maximum in the northern winter and a minimum in the northern summer. This "seasonal variation" is stronger at higher frequencies (Pc 3 and Pc 4 frequencies). (2) The north to south power ratio for the Pc 4 and Pc 5 frequency band is basically greater than 1.0 for all seasons. This "positive offset" is stronger at lower frequencies. The "seasonal variation" implies that the magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) waves incident from the magnetosphere are more strongly shielded when the ionospheric conductivity is higher. The "positive offset" may result from the difference of the background magnetic field intensity between KOT and MCQ..
29. Obana, A. Yoshikawa, J.V. Olson, R.J. Morris, B.J. Fraser, S.I. Solovyev, and K. Yumoto, Techniques to investigate the ionospheric effect on ULF waves, Proceeding of The fifth Workshop on Applications of Radio Science (WARS) obart Australia, on Feb. 18-20, 2004, CD-ROM, H12, 2004.02.
30. Abe S., K. Yumoto, H. Kawano, A. Yoshikawa, Y. Obana, S. I. Solovyev, D.G. Baishev, J.V. Olson, E.W. Worthington, and the Circum-pan Pacific Magnetometer Network Group, The Diagnosis of the Plasmapause by Ground Magnetometer Network Observation at Multiple Local Times, International Symposium on Information Science and Electrical Engineering 2003, Nov.13-14, 2003, ACROS Fukuoka, Fukuoka, Japan, 534-536, 2003.11.
31. Kitamura. K., H. Kawano, S. Ohtani, A. Yoshikawa, K. Yumoto, and the Circum-pan Pacific Magnetometer Network Group, Quasi-periodic Substorms during Recovery Phase of Magnetic Storm for Space Weather Study, 354-357, 2003.11.
32. Obana Y., A. Yoshikawa, J.V. Olson, R.J. Morris, B.J. Fraser, S.I. Solovyev and K. Yumoto, Environment Factors of PC 4 Amplitudes Observed at the CPMN Stations, International Symposium on Information Science and Electrical Engineering 2003, Nov.13-14, 2003, ACROS Fukuoka, Fukuoka, Japan, 256-258, 2003.11.
33. Yoshikawa A. , H. Kohta, M.I tonaga, T. Uozumi, K. Yumoto, Inegrated Analysis of Coordinated Ground Magnetic Field Data for Space Weather Study, International Symposium on Information Science and Electrical Engineering 2003, Nov.13-14, 2003, ACROS Fukuoka, Fukuoka, Japan, 114-117, 2003.11.
34. Takasaki S., H. Kawano, Y. Tanaka, A. Yoshikawa, M. Seto, M. Iizima, and K. Yumoto, Plasma Distribution in the Low-L part of the Plasma sphere during Magnetic Storms, International Symposium on Information Science and Electrical Engineering 2003, Nov.13-14, 2003, ACROS Fukuoka, Fukuoka, Japan, 253-255, 2003.11.
35. Akimasa Yoshikawa, Yuki Obana, Manabu Shinohara, Masahiro Itonaga, Kiyohumi Yumoto, Hall-induced inductive shielding effect on geomagnetic pulsations, Geophysical Research Letters, 29, 8, 2002.04, A new formula describing the inductive response of the magnetosphere-ionosphere-atmosphere-Earth electromagnetic coupled system to the time development of the field-aligned current (FAC) source-field is developed. Using this new formula, the Hall-induced inductive shielding effect (ISE) on geomagnetic pulsation is investigated. The ISE is caused by the reduction of the amplitude of total rotational current because of the generation of "inductive" rotational current by the inductive part of ionospheric divergent electric field, which originates the existence of divergent Hall current. It will be shown that the ISE is more efficient for high-frequency pulsations, large horizontal scale phenomena and high-conducting ionospheric conditions. Quantitative analysis strongly suggests that the ionospheric conductivity in the dayside hemisphere can easily reach and sometimes exceed the turning point of geomagnetic pulsations of which frequencies are in the Pc 3 ∼ 4 pulsations range..
36. Akimasa Yoshikawa, How does the ionospheric rotational Hall current absorb the increasing energy from the field-aligned current system?, Geophysical Research Letters, 10.1029/2001GL014125, 29, 7, 2002.04, [URL], It has been well recognized that field-aligned current (FAC) systems lose their energy in the ionosphere through the Joule dissipation that is caused by their closure via the ionospheric Pedersen current, and that the ionospheric Hall current cannot contribute the total energy dissipation. However, it is also true that the rotational Hall current is excited by the incident FAC, and it radiates a Poynting vector that grows a poloidal-type magnetic field. Even if the Hall effect cannot do work on an external system, what does its contribution to the accumulation of poloidal magnetic energy really mean? In this paper, it is clarified that the divergent Hall current, excited during the transient phase of magnetosphere-ionosphere coupling, closes via the FAC and produces a Hall current generator, which pumps up the energy of the FAC system to increase the ionospheric rotational Hall current (together with its associated poloidal magnetic field)..
37. Akimasa Yoshikawa, Excitation of a Hall-current generator by field-aligned current closure, via an ionospheric, divergent Hall-current, during the transient phase of magnetosphere-ionosphere coupling, Journal of Geophysical Research, 10.1029/2001JA009170, 107, A12, 2002.03, [URL], To clarify the process by which an ionospheric current system is formed by field-aligned current (FAC) closure in the ionosphere, an inclusive formulation of magnetosphere-ionosphere (MI) coupling is undertaken. The "Hall-current generator", which is excited during the transient phase of MI coupling, plays a crucial role in the formation of the ionospheric rotational-current system. It extracts energy from the FAC system through the divergent Hajl-current and pumps it into the rotational Hall-current. The energy of the rotational current accumulates as an evanescent poloidal magnetic field, associated with the ionospheric surface wave. This accumulated energy is also fed back to the FAC system through the change in energy flow of the Hall-current generator. It is found that there is a typical timescale for the rotational-current system to accumulate or extract the poloidal magnetic energy of ionospheric surface waves. This depends on the inductance of the rotational-current system and the effective conductivity of the ionospheric rotational current. This characteristic timescale becomes the cause of an ionospheric inductive effect, such as a time delay or phase lag between the source electromagnetic field of the FAC and the corresponding poloidal magnetic field on the ground. The latter causes an inductive shielding effect on the amplitude of the geomagnetic disturbance. Numerical simulation has been able to explain the details of the physical process that occurs when the incident FAC is developing and decaying, and how the energy and current are redistributed into the other elements during the transient MI-coupling process.
38. Yoshikawa, A., M. Itonaga and K. Yumoto, On the energy of the poloidal magnetic field near the ionosphere, Advances in Polar Upper Atmospheric Research, No.16, 45-58, 2002.01.
39. Akimasa Yoshikawa, Kiyohumi Yumoto, Manabu Shinohara, Masahiro Itonaga, Diagrammatic method to describe the self-inductive response of the magnetosphere-ionosphere-atmosphere-Earth electromagnetically coupled system as a quasi-particle excitation, Journal of Geophysical Research, 10.1029/2000JA000405, 107, A5, 2002.01, [URL], [i] A diagrammatic method to intuitively describe the inductive response of wave fields in the magnetosphere-ionosphere-atmosphere-Earth (MIAE) electromagnetically coupled system is developed. The coupling process of magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) waves and atmospheric electromagnetic waves, which interact with an anisotropically conducting thin sheet ionosphere, can be understood in terms of a process of redistribution of the induced current of wave modes. On the basis of the current conservation law and Faraday's law of electromagnetic induction, a redistribution process of the source-induced current of wave modes to the secondary wave is simply illustrated. The purpose of this paper is to propose a methodology to describe the inductive response of a complex electromagnetically coupled system that is divided by a conducting boundary layer. As an example, we derive the reflection coefficient and the mode conversion ratio of MHD waves at an anisotropic, inductive ionosphere by using the concept of induced current redistribution. We also demonstrate that the redistribution process of wave modes under the law of conservation of induced current also satisfies an energy conservation law in the MIAE system. However, the true merit of this method is its applicability to the highly inhomogeneous region, in which many types of waves exist and interact through thearbitrary boundary layers..
40. Masahiro Itonaga, Akimasa Yoshikawa, Shigeru Fujita, A wave equation describing the generation of field-aligned current in the magnetosphere, Earth, Planets and Space, 10.1186/BF03351654, 52, 7, 503-507, 2000.08, [URL], A wave equation describing the generation of field-aligned current (FAC) in the magnetosphere is derived. The equation has four source terms. The first and second terms represent the effects of inhomogeneous Alfven speed (VA) and curvilinear magnetic field line, respectively. The perpendicular perturbation inertial current produces the perturbation FAC via these effects. Around the magnetic equator in the region of dipolar magnetic field where VA is inversely proportional to the power of the radial distance from the Earth's center, the first and second terms have magnitudes of the same order and their signs are identical. The first term dominates over the second one around the region where the gradient of VA is sharp and vice versa around the position where the stretched field line intersects the magnetic equator. The third and fourth terms are related to the diamagnetic current. When the unperturbed magnetic pressure has an inhomogeneous distribution, the perpendicular diamagnetic current due to the perturbation of the plasma pressure yields the perturbation FAC (third term). When the perpendicular diamagnetic current flows in the unperturbed state, the perturbations of the magnetic and plasma pressures also bring about the perturbation FAC (fourth term). In the case of β ~ 1, the third and fourth terms have magnitudes of the same order. If the disturbance bears a diamagnetic property, this would be especially the case. However, if the disturbance propagates perpendicularly to the ambient magnetic field, the perturbation FAC would be little generated by the fourth term..
41. Akimasa Yoshikawa, M. Itonaga, The nature of reflection and mode conversion of MHD waves in the inductive ionosphere
Multistep mode conversion between divergent and rotational electric fields, Journal of Geophysical Research, 105, A5, 10565-10584, 2000.05, The nature of reflection and mode conversion of MHD waves at the high-latitudinal inductive ionosphere is analyzed, based on the current conservation law of wave modes. The term "inductive ionosphere" refers to the nonzero rotational electric field or nonzero compressional magnetic field in the reflection process of shear Alfvén waves on the ionosphere. The finite rotational electric field causes mutual induction between the divergent and rotational current systems at the ionosphere. The one-step Hall effect for the divergent electric field of the shear Alfvén wave produces a rotational Hall current and excites the ionospheric surface compressional wave. The Hall effect for the rotational electric field of an ionospheric surface compressional wave produces a divergent Hall current (two-step Hall effect), which feeds back the compressional magnetic energy to the reflected field-aligned current. We find that the renormalization of the ionospheric rotational electric field to the reflection process of the shear Alfvén wave causes some peculiarities in the distribution of ionospheric currents and mode-converted wave magnetic fields. Such peculiarities become particularly obvious in the high-conducting ionosphere. For example, in the ionospheric current distributions, a considerable component of the ionospheric divergent current is accounted for by the divergent Hall current. The rotational Hall and Pedersen currents cancel each other out and lead to zero total ionospheric rotational current. The amplitude of the poloidal magnetic field transmitted from the toroidal magnetic field of the incident shear Alfvén wave shows a nonlinear dependence on ΣHP. It also shows a new type of effective ionospheric shielding effect in the ΣPA parameter space for a fixed ΣHP condition. We assert that the inductive response of the ionosphere should become an indispensable concept for reflection, mode conversion, transmission, and generation of various phenomena relating to the field-aligned current system..
42. M. Itonaga, A. Yoshikawa, K. Yumoto, S. Fujita and H. Nakata, A study on the generation of field-aligned current in the magnetosphere, Mem. Fac. Sci., Kyushu Univ., Ser. D, Earth and Planet. Sci., Vol, XXXI, No1, 1-9, 2000.01.
43. Itonaga, M., A. Yoshikawa and K. Yumoto, Transient response of the non-uniform equatorial ionosphere to compressional MHD waves, Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics, 10.1016/S1364-6826(97)00110-7, 60, 2, 253-261, Vol.60, N0.2, 253-261, 1998.01.
44. M. Itonaga, Akimasa Yoshikawa, K. Yumoto, One-dimensional transient response of the inner magnetosphere at the magnetic equator, 2. analysis of waveforms, Earth, Planets and Space, 49, 1, 49-68, 1997.02, Under a model of altitude distribution of the Alfvén speed VA, one-dimensional transient response of the inner magnetosphere at the magnetic equator to earthward propagating impulse- and step-like MHD disturbances is considered. The waveforms of transient compressional oscillations due to these disturbances at some L shells are directly simulated by a numerical inversion of the Laplace transform with orthonormal Laguerre functions. The present paper concentrates on the analysis of waveforms. Then, it is verified that the compressional oscillations are due to the poles of the system under consideration. The oscillation arising from the cavity resonance all over the inner magnetosphere is most dominant. However, its amplitude becomes smaller as the characteristic time scale T of an incident disturbance grows large, and it is negligibly small for T greater than several times of eigenperiod of the resonance. On the other hand, when T is relatively small (e.g., T £10 s), the oscillations due to the cavity resonances trapped around the trough in VA are outstanding. It is also found that the relative phase between the cavity-mode oscillations all over the inner magnetosphere at the earth's surface and another L shell increases monotonically with L when the inner magnetosphere has no strong gradient or a strong positive gradient of VA at its outer boundary. However, the relative phase is nearly zero and nearly 180 inside and outside a specific L shell, respectively, when the inner magnetosphere has a strong negative gradient at its outer boundary. The one-dimensional cavity-mode type resonance of the inner magnetosphere is certainly a cause of equatorial Pi2 pulsations. However, some constituents of the Pi2's may be not cavity-mode oscillations but quasi-steady-state oscillations forced by some damped sinusoidal waves incident on the outer boundary of the inner magnetosphere..
45. M. Itonaga, Akimasa Yoshikawa, K. Yumoto, One-dimensional transient response of the inner magnetosphere at the magnetic equator, 1. transfer function and poles, Earth, Planets and Space, 10.5636/jgg.49.21, 49, 1, 21-48, 1997.01, [URL], One-dimensional transient response of the inner magnetosphere at the magnetic equator is investigated using two models of altitude distribution of the Alfvén speed VA- The present paper concentrates on the transfer function of the system under consideration and its poles, which govern the transient response of the system. The poles, which are mathematical counterparts of the cavity resonances, appear owing to the inhomogeneity of VA and their locations depend on the altitude distribution of VA as well as the position of external source (or outer boundary of the inner magnetosphere). Even if there exists no strong Alfvén velocity gradient at the outer boundary, an observable cavity-mode oscillation in the Pi2 range can be excited because of the existence of a strong gradient of the plasmapause within the inner magnetosphere. However, the existence of a strong gradient at the outer boundary brings about a long-lived nature of the cavity-mode oscillation as well as calls some new poles into existence. While the surface of the solid earth forms the inner boundary at which the almost perfect reflection of wave takes place, the ionosphere is of secondary importance as a reflector of wave. The existence of the solid earth plays an essential role in the observability of the compressional oscillation arising from the cavity resonance all over the inner magnetosphere. The real part of each pole has a negative value, meaning that the cavity-mode oscillation decays with a damping factor of absolute value of the real part of the pole. Such a damping is primarily due to the leakage of energy through the outer boundary of the inner magnetosphere..
46. M. Itonaga, Akimasa Yoshikawa, The excitation of shear alfvén wave and the associated modulation of compressional wave in the inner magnetosphere, Earth, Planets and Space, 10.5636/jgg.48.1451, 48, 11, 1451-1459, 1996.06, [URL], Two basic but novel equations directly describing the generation of shear Alfvén and compressional waves in the inner magnetosphere filled with a cold magnetized plasma are derived. The shear Alfvén wave is characterized by the field-aligned current and the compressional wave by the compressional component of the magnetic field. Such a generation arises from the effects of inhomogeneous Alfvén speed and curvilinear field line. Around the magnetic equator, if the Alfvén speed is inversely proportional to a power of the geocentric distance, these effects have magnitudes of the same order and their signs are identical. Considered in the present study is a situation that the earthward propagating compressional wave is launched from a large scale oscillating current wedge centered at midnight and symmetric about the magnetic equator. Then, it is found that the field-aligned current excited around the equator by the compressional wave has opposite senses in direction in the northern and southern hemispheres, in the pro- and post-midnight sectors as well as just inside the plasmapause and in its surrounding regions. As a result of the excitation of shear Alfvén wave, two types of oscillations appear on a field line: One is a forced oscillation and the other is an eigenoscillation. Although a modulation of the compressional wave may be caused locally (or microscopically) around the equator by the eigenoscillation of field line, the modulation can be globally (or macroscopically) neglected. So far as the propagation along the source longitude (source-earth line) around the equator is concerned, the coupling between compressional and shear Alfvén waves can be almost neglected and so one-dimensional response of the inner magnetosphere around the equator plays a significant role in the compressional oscillation..
47. Yoshikawa, A., and M. Itonaga, Reflection of shear Alfven waves at the ionosphere and the divergent Hall current, Geophysical Research Letters, 10.1029/95GL03580, 23, 1, 101-104, Vol.23, No.1, 101-104, 1996.01.
48. Yoshikawa, A., M. Itonaga and T.-I.Kitamura, Effect of the ionospheric induction current on magnetohydrodynamic waves in the magnetosphere, Proceedings of the NIPR Symposium on Upper Atmosphere Physics, Vol.17, No.8, 49-59, 1995, 1995.01.
49. Itonaga, M., T.-I.Kitamura and A. Yoshikawa, Interaction between hydromagnetic waves and the anisotropically conducting ionosphere, Journal of Geomagnetism and Geoelectricity, 47, 5, 459-474, Vol.47, No.5, 459-474, 1995, 1995.01.
50. Yoshikawa, A., M. Itonaga and T.-I.Kitamura, On the coupled effect between the field aligned and ionospheric current, Proceeding of Eight International Symposium on Solar Terrestrial Physics, June 5-10, 1994, Sendai, Japan, 155-159, 1994.06.
51. Itonaga, M., and A. Yoshikawa, Discrete spectral structure of low latitude and equatorial Pi2 pulsations,, Journal of Geomagnetism and Geoelectricity, Vol.44, No.3, 253-259, 44, 3, 253-259, 1992.01.
主要総説, 論評, 解説, 書評, 報告書等
1. Yoshikawa A., O. Amm, and R. Fujii, 3次元Cowlingチャンネルの理論, 名古屋大学太陽地球環境研究所, 対流研究会抄録,88-109, 2009.12.
2. Yoshikawa A.,(pp.1-10), and A. Nakamizo (pp.11-20), 宇宙天気概況解析実験マニュアル, 九州大学宙空環境研究センター, 2006.04.
3. 吉川顕正、河野英昭、公田浩子、高崎聡子、魚住禎司、北村健太郎、湯元清文, 地上多点磁場観測と海底ケーブルを組み合わせた宙空電磁環境のモニタリング/モデリングの可能性について, 4D地球・ 海洋・環境科学研究の幕開け-海底ケーブルの科学的利用による海洋観測の新時代-、月刊地球, VOL. 26, NO. 5, 307-314, 2004, 2004.12.
主要学会発表等
1. Teiji Uozumi, Akimasa Yoshikawa, Shinichi Ohtani, Atsushi Kumamoto, Fuminori Tsuchiya, Yoshiya Kasahara, Characteristics of temporal variation of AKR and Pi 2 observed by ARASE and MAGDAS/CPMN: Initial results, 第144回 地球電磁気・地球惑星圏学会総会・講演会(2018年 秋学会), 2018.11, [URL].
2. Akihiro Ikeda,Teiji Uozumi, Akimasa Yoshikawa, Akiko Fujimoto, Shuji Abe, , Variation of Schumann Resonance during the intense solar activity from October to November, 2003, 第144回 地球電磁気・地球惑星圏学会総会・講演会(2018年 秋学会), 2018.11, [URL].
3. Shun Imajo, Akimasa Yoshikawa, Teiji Uozumi, Shinichi Ohtani, Aoi Nakamizo, Peter Chi , Propagation of Pi2 pulsation from nightside to dayside: Observations and modeling of global current system, 第144回 地球電磁気・地球惑星圏学会総会・講演会(2018年 秋学会), 2018.11, [URL].
4. 秋山 鷹史, 吉川 顕正, 藤本 晶子, 魚住 禎司, EEJ、CEJ とプラズマバブルの関係, 第144回 地球電磁気・地球惑星圏学会総会・講演会(2018年 秋学会), 2018.11, [URL].
5. 中原 美音, 吉川 顕正, 魚住 禎司, 藤本 晶子, 磁気擾乱時における中低緯度領域電磁誘導応答の研究, 第144回 地球電磁気・地球惑星圏学会総会・講演会(2018年 秋学会), 2018.11, [URL].
6. 波多江 真紀, 吉川 顕正, 魚住 禎司, サブストームオンセット後に励起されるPc4脈動とオーロラストリーマの動態解明に向けて, 第144回 地球電磁気・地球惑星圏学会総会・講演会(2018年 秋学会), 2018.11, [URL].
7. Akimasa Yoshikawa, Teiji Uozumi, Aoi Nakamizo, Shinichi Ohtani, Revisiting the dynamic process of field-aligned current generation, 第144回 地球電磁気・地球惑星圏学会総会・講演会(2018年 秋学会), 2018.11, [URL].
8. 田中 良昌、小川 泰信、門倉 昭、Gustavsson Bjorn、Partamies Noora、Kauristie Kirsti、Whiter Daniel、Enell Carl-fredrik、Brandstrom Urban、Sergienko Tima、Kozlovsky Alexander、Vanhamaki Heikki、吉川 顕正、宮岡 宏, 3D current system of eastward expanding auroral surges, 日本地球惑星科学連合2018大会, 2018.05, [URL].
9. 寺田 綱一朗、垰 千尋、寺田 直樹、笠羽 康正、北 元、中溝 葵、吉川 顕正、大谷 晋一、土屋 史紀、鍵谷 将人、坂野井 健、村上 豪、吉岡 和夫、木村 智樹、山崎 敦、吉川 一朗, , Study of the Jovian magnetosphere-ionosphere coupling using an ionospheric potential solver: Contributions of H+ and meteoric ions to ionospheric conductivity, 日本地球惑星科学連合2018大会, 2018.05, [URL].
10. 高橋 直子、関 華奈子、寺本 万里子、Mei-Ching Fok、松岡 彩子、東尾 奈々、塩川 和夫、Dmitry Baishev、吉川 顕正, , Global distribution of ULF waves during magnetic storms: Comparison of Arase and ground observations and BATSRUS+CRCM modeling, 日本地球惑星科学連合2018大会, 2018.05, [URL].
11. 山本 衛、橋口 浩之、宮岡 宏、小川 泰信、塩川 和夫、野澤 悟徳、吉川 顕正、津田 敏隆,, 太陽地球系結合過程の研究基盤形成, 日本地球惑星科学連合2018大会, 2018.05, [URL].
12. 池田 昭大、魚住 禎司、吉川 顕正、藤本 晶子、野澤 宏大, Variation of Schumann resonance at Kuju station during solar flares, 日本地球惑星科学連合2018大会, 2018.05, [URL].
13. 阿部 修司、吉川 顕正、魚住 禎司、藤本 晶子 , Recent activities of MAGDAS project, 日本地球惑星科学連合2018大会, 2018.05, [URL].
14. 吉川 顕正、大谷 晋一、中溝 葵、今城 峻, Research project for investigation of active role of ionospheric dynamics on the magnetosphere-ionosphere coupled system, 日本地球惑星科学連合2018大会, 2018.05, [URL].
15. 中溝 葵、吉川 顕正、田中 高史, Effects of Ionospheric Hall Polarization on Magnetospheric Configurations and Dynamics in Global MHD Simulation, 日本地球惑星科学連合2018大会, 2018.05, [URL].
16. 藤本 晶子、池田 昭大、吉川 顕正, FM-CW radar project: goals and a new installation in Peru, 日本地球惑星科学連合2018大会, 2018.05, [URL].
17. 白 旻基,吉川 顕正, Study of anomalous behaviors of geomagnetic diurnal variations prior to earthquake, 日本地球惑星科学連合2018大会, 2018.05, [URL].
18. Akimasa YOSHIKAWA, Research of Geomagnetism for Earth and Space Environmen, Theme Seminar of the Scientific lecture at the annual Theme Seminar of the Sri Lanka Association for the Advancement of Science (“Space Science and Technology Applications for Sustainable Development” ), 2018.12.
19. Akimasa YOSHIKAWA, Geomagnetism and Life, Geomagnetic Focus Group Discussion 2018, 2018.09.
20. Siti Nurbaiti Ibrahim, Mohamad Huzaimy Jusoh, Ahmad Asari Sulaiman, Akimasa Yoshikawa, , Characteristic of the Disturbed Days Ionospheric Current System in the 180-Degree Magnetic Meridian, International Conference on Space Weather and Satellite Application (ICeSSAT2018), 2018.08, [URL].
21. Mio Nakahara, Akimasa Yoshikawa,Teiji Uozumi, Akiko Fujimoto, Electromagnetic Induction Responses to Geomagnetic Disturbances at Low-And-Mid-Latitudes, International Conference on Space Weather and Satellite Application (ICeSSAT2018), 2018.08, [URL].
22. Takafumi Akiyama and Akimasa Yoshikawa, Akiko Fujimoto, Teiji Uozumi, Relationship Between Plasma Bubble and Ionospheric Current Equatorial Electrojet and Equatorial Counter Electrojet, International Conference on Space Weather and Satellite Application (ICeSSAT2018), 2018.08, [URL].
23. Akimasa YOSHIKAWA, Space Weather Data in IR 4.0 (Industry Revolution 4.0) era and the success story on MAGDAS project, International Conference on Space Weather and Satellite Application (ICeSSAT2018), 2018.08, [URL].
24. Akihiro IKEDA, Teiji UOZUMI, Akimasa YOSHIKAWA, Akiko FUJIMOTO, Shuji ABE, Hiromasa NOZAWA, Manabu SHINOHARA, Response of Schumann Resonance to Solar and Geomagnetic Activities, AOGS2018 15th Annual Meeting, 2018.06, [URL].
25. Akiko FUJIMOTO, Akimasa YOSHIKAWA, Toshiya NISHIGUCHI,, Local Time Characteristic of Low-Latitude Geomagnetic Field Response to Intense Solar Flares, AOGS2018 15th Annual Meeting, 2018.06, [URL].
26. Teiji UOZUMI, Akimasa YOSHIKAWA, Shin OHTANI , Dmitry BAISHEV, Alexey MOISEEV, Boris SHEVTSOV, Decomposition of the Wave Elements of the Global High-Correlation Pi 2, AOGS2018 15th Annual Meeting, 2018.06, [URL].
27. Akimasa Yoshikawa, On Generalization of Birkeland Current System in the Tree-Dimensional Magnetosphere-Ionosphere Coupling, AOGS2018 15th Annual Meeting, 2018.06, [URL].
28. A Nakamizo, A Yoshikawa, T Tanaka,, Effects of Ionospheric Hall Polarization on Magnetospheric Configurations and Dynamics in Global MHD Simulation, AGU Fall Meeting, 2017.12.
29. 青柳 優介, 吉川 顕正 , PBI 数値シミュレーション~オーロラオーバルとオーロラストリーマーの相互作用 について~ ,  第142回地球電磁気・地球惑星圏学会, 2017.10.
30. Akimasa Yoshikawa,Shinichi Ohtani , New interpretation PBI,  第142回地球電磁気・地球惑星圏学会, 2017.10.
31. Shun Imajo, Akimasa Yoshikawa, Teiji Uozumi, Shinichi Ohtani, Aoi Nakamizo, Peter Chi, Application of a magnetospheric-ionospheric current model for dayside and terminator Pi2 pulsation,  第142回地球電磁気・地球惑星圏学会, 2017.10.
32. Aoi Nakamizo, Akimasa Yoshikawa, Takashi Tanaka, Effects of Ionospheric Hall Polarization Field on Magnetosphere in Global MHD Simulation,  第142回地球電磁気・地球惑星圏学会, 2017.10.
33. Shinichi Ohtani, Tetsuo Motoba, Akimasa Yoshikawa, Formation and Development of Poleward Boundary Intensifications of Auroral Emission,  第142回地球電磁気・地球惑星圏学会, 2017.10.
34. 西口 俊弥, 吉川 顕正, 藤本 晶子,松下 拓輝, 各地方時におけるSFEの発生特性について,  第142回地球電磁気・地球惑星圏学会, 2017.10.
35. 中原 美音, 吉川 顕正, 魚住 禎司, 藤本 晶子, 松下 拓輝 , 磁気擾乱時における中低緯度領域電磁誘導応答の研究,  第142回地球電磁気・地球惑星圏学会, 2017.10.
36. 秋山 鷹史, 吉川 顕正, 藤本 晶子, 魚住 禎司,
CEJ発生日のプラズマバブルイベント,  第142回地球電磁気・地球惑星圏学会, 2017.10.
37. Akiko Fujimoto, Ayako Matsuoka, Akimasa Yoshikawa, Mariko Teramoto, Reiko Nomura, Yoshimasa Tanaka, Manabu Shinohara, Comparison of ULF waves measured by the ERG satellite and MAGDAS network,  第142回地球電磁気・地球惑星圏学会, 2017.10.
38. Akiko Fujimoto, Akimasa Yoshikawa, Teiji Uozumi, Shuji Abe, Hiroki Matsushita , Seasonal dependence of semidiurnal equatorial magnetic variations,  第142回地球電磁気・地球惑星圏学会, 2017.10.
39. Yoshikawa A., Monitoring of Space and Earth electromagnetic environment by MAGDAS project: Collaboration with IKIR, International Conference on Solar-Terrestrial Relations and Physics of Earthquake Precursors, 2017.09.
40. Akihiro Ikeda, Teiji Uozumi, Akimasa Yoshikawa, Akiko Fujimoto, Shuji Abe, Hiromasa Nozawa, Manabu Shinohara,, Characteristics of Schumann Resonance Parameters at Kuju Station, International Conference on Solar-Terrestrial Relations and Physics of Earthquake Precursors, 2017.09.
41. Yoshikawa A., Study of Coupling Processes in the Solar-Terrestrial System, 2nd National School on EARTH and ELECTROMAGNETISM, 2017.08.
42. Yoshikawa A., Geomagnetic observation to support space weather study, AMGASA Public Talk, 2017.08, 汎世界的な地磁気多点観測網によりあぶり出される様々な宇宙天気現象、宇宙ー気象ー地象結合現象について紹介し、その適用サイエンスの幅広さと様々な地球物理現象のモニタリングの可能性について、わかりやすく講演する。.
43. Yoshikawa A., What is Space Weather?, Universidad Nacional Agraria de la Selva (UNAS) Invited Seminar, 2017.08.
44. @Yoshikawa A. , Recent Development of ICWSE/MAGDAS project for Study of Coupling Processes in the Solar-Terrestrial System, 日本地球惑星科学連合2017大会, 2017.05.
45. @Yoshikawa A. , Magnetosphere-Ionosphere coupling process produced by Ampere force forcing from the magnetosphere, 日本地球惑星科学連合2017大会, 2017.05.
46. @藤本 晶子、吉川 顕正、魚住 禎司、阿部 修司、松下 拓輝 , MAGDASプロジェクトEE-indexの磁気赤道域現象への適用事例, 日本地球惑星科学連合2017大会, 2017.05.
47. 中溝 葵、吉川 顕正、田中 高史, Study on Effects of Ionospheric Polarization Field and Inner Boundary Conditions on Magnetospheric Dynamics and Substorm Processes in Global MHD Simulation, 日本地球惑星科学連合2017大会, 2017.05.
48. 今城 峻、吉川 顕正、魚住 禎司、大谷 晋一、中溝 葵, Application of Global Three-Dimensional Current Model for Dayside and Terminator Pi2 Pulsations, 日本地球惑星科学連合2017大会, 2017.05.
49. 秋山 鷹史、吉川 顕正、松下 拓輝、藤本 晶子、魚住 禎司, On the relationships between EEJ distribution and plasma bubble occurrences, 日本地球惑星科学連合2017大会, 2017.05.
50. 中原 美音、松下 拓輝、吉川 顕正、魚住 禎司、藤本 晶子、阿部 修司, 磁気擾乱時における中低緯度領域電磁誘導応答の研究, 日本地球惑星科学連合2017大会, 2017.05.
51. 阿部 修司、花田 俊也、吉川 顕正、平井 隆之、河本 聡美 , スペースデブリ環境推移モデルにおける大気密度モデルの改良と宇宙天気活動の影響評価, 日本地球惑星科学連合2017大会, 2017.05.
52. 津田 敏隆、山本 衛、橋口 浩之、宮岡 宏、小川 泰信、塩川 和夫、野澤 悟徳、吉川 顕正, Study of the Coupled Solar-Earth System with Large Atmospheric Radars,
Ground-based Observation Network and Satellite Data: Project Overview, 日本地球惑星科学連合2017大会, 2017.05.
53. Nurul Shazana Abdul Hamid、Saeed Abioye Bello、Mardina Abdullah、Akimasa Yoshikawa, The Sq-current and the Ionospheric Profile Parameters during Solar Minimum, 日本地球惑星科学連合2017大会, 2017.05.
54. Nurul Shazana Abdul Hamid、Wan Nur Izzaty Ismail、Mardina Abdullah、Akimasa Yoshikawa, Latitudinal and Longitudinal Profile of EEJ current during different phases of Solar Cycle, 日本地球惑星科学連合2017大会, 2017.05.
55. @Yoshikawa A., MAGDAS/CPMNプロジェクトの現状と課題, 九州大学西新プラザ、福岡県福岡市, 2017.03.
56. 藤本晶子, 魚住禎司, 阿部修司, 松下拓輝, 吉川顕正, , EE-indexに基づく赤道地磁気活動の概況報告(2016年9月~2017年2月), 平成28年度・第2回STE現象報告会, 2017.03.
57. 藤本晶子, 吉川顕正, 魚住禎司, 阿部修司, 松下拓輝, MAGDASプロジェクト, EE-indexの磁気赤道域現象への適用事例と課題, 平成28年度・第2回STE現象報告会, 2017.03.
58. 今城峻, 吉川顕正, 魚住禎司, 西村幸敏, Vassilis Angelopoulos, Eric Donovan, 振動電流系、定在性および伝播性MHD波動としてのPi2振動の共存: 事例解析, 電磁圏物理学シンポジウム, 2017.03.
59. Quirino Sugon Jr., Christine Chan, Felix Muga II, Clint Bennett, Randell Teodoro, Sergio Su, Daniel McNamara, Dexter Lo, Roland Otadoy, Grace Rolusta, Akiko Fujimoto, Teiji Uozumi, and Akimasa Yoshikawa,, Co-seismic magnetic signatures of Moro Gulf Quake of 2010-07-23 using MAGDAS data, 地域ネットワークによる宇宙天気の観測・教育活動に関する研究集会, 2017.03.
60. Yoshikawa A., MAGDAS/CPMNプロジェクトの現状と課題, シンポジウム「太陽地球系科学に於ける地上観測の現状と課題」, 2017.03.
61. @Yoshikawa A., A. Nakamizo, and S. Ohtani, Generalized Description of Three- Dimensional Magnetosphere-Ionosphere Coupling by Shear Alfvén Waves, 2016 Fall AGU Meeting, 2016.12.
62. Ohtani, S., and @A. Yoshikawa, Field-aligned Currents Induced by Electrostatic Polarization at the Ionosphere: Application to the Poleward Boundary Intensification (PBI) of Auroral Emission, 2016 Fall AGU Meeting, 2016.12.
63. A. Nakamizo and @A. Yoshikawa, Possibility of Ionospheric Cause of FACs and Convection Field in the Magnetosphere-Ionosphere System: The Harang Reversal, Premidnight Upward-FAC, and the Ionospheric Hall Polarization Field, 2016 Fall AGU Meeting, 2016.12.
64. Matsushita, H., A. Yoshikawa, T. Uozumi, A. Fujimoto, S. Abe, J. K. Ishitsuka, O. Veliz, D. Rosales, E. Safor and V. Beteta, Development of EEJ Model Based on Dense Ground-based Magnetometer Array, 2016 Fall AGU Meeting, 2016.12.
65. @Yoshikawa A., Magnetosphere-Ionosphere Coupling, The SCOSTEP/ISWI International School on Space Science, 2016.11.
66. 吉川顕正, Generalization of Ionospheric Polarization and Magnetospheric Field- Resonance, 第140回 SGEPSS総会および講演会, 2016.11.
67. 中溝葵,吉川顕正,中田裕之, 磁気圏MHDグローバルモデルにおける磁気圏電離圏解法部分の概要・ 再考・改良計画
, 第13回 宇宙環境シンポジウム, 2016.11.
68. Fujimoto, A., T. Uozumi, S. Abe, H. Matsushita, and A. Yoshikawa, , Lunar tide variation of Equatorial Electrojet based on the long-term EE-index, 第140回 SGEPSS総会および講演会, 2016.11.
69. 今城峻, 西村幸敏, 吉川顕正, 魚住禎司, Ohtani Shinichi, 中溝葵, Vassilis Agelopoulos, Stephen Mende, Auroral features of Pi2 pulsation associated with poleward boundary intensification, 第140回 SGEPSS総会および講演会, 2016.11.
70. Imajo, S., A. Yoshikawa, T. Uozumi, S. Ohtani, A. Nakamizo, S.Demberel, and B. M. Shevtsov, , Solar terminator effects on middle- to low-latitude Pi2 pulsations, 第140回 SGEPSS総会および講演会, 2016.11.
71. 藤本晶子, 魚住禎司, 阿部修司, 松下拓輝, and 吉川顕正, , EE-indexに基づく赤道地磁気活動の概況報告(2016年4月~2016年11月), 平成28年度・第1回STE現象報告会, 2016.11.
72. Shun Imajo, Yukitoshi Nishimura, Akimasa Yoshikawa, Teiji Uozumi, Shinichi Ohtani, Aoi Nakamizo, Vassilis Angelopoulos, Stephen Mende,, Coordinated observation of Pi2 pulsations by global magnetometer array, all sky imager and satellites in the plasmasphere, NIPR Symposium on Polar Science, 2016.11.
73. 吉川顕正, 磁気圏電離圏結合, 平成28年度「磁気圏・電離圏シンポジウム」、電離圏・磁気圏探査衛星検討リサーチグループ第1回会合」, 2016.10.
74. 吉川顕正, 磁気圏電離圏結合ダイナミクスの無撞着な記述:境界条件を超えて, 「磁気圏複合系研究会・プラズマシート極域電離圏投影問題研究会」, 2016.09.
75. Yoshikawa A., (B,V) Paradigm of Magnetosphere-Ionosphere Coupling, URSI Asia-Pacific Radio Science Conference (URSI AP-RASC 2016), 2016.08, これまでの磁気圏電離圏結合研究では、磁気圏側はMHDダイナミクス(B-Vパラダイム)で、電離圏側は静電的な電離層電流層近似(J-Eパラダイム)で扱われ、その両者は静電的な境界条件をつうじた結合問題として扱われてきた。本研究では電離圏ダイナミクスをイオン-中性大気の衝突効果により必然的に生じるHall電場を電離圏から磁気圏までシームレスに導入する理論的枠組を整理し、磁気圏電離圏結合系を一つの系のダイナミクスの下に記述する(B,V)パラダイムを提案する。これにより、これまで電気回路的な理解しかされてこなかった電離圏特有の現象をプラズマダイナミクスの文脈の下に記述することが可能となる。.
76. Impact of Space Weather on Earth COSPAR Capacity Building Workshop, Magnetosphere-Ionosphere coupling by shear Alfven wave, August 15 – 26, 2016, 2016.08.
77. 吉川顕正, Alfven波による一般化された3次元磁気圏電離圏結合, 名大ISEE/極地研/NICT/京大RISH 共同主催「中間圏・熱圏・電離圏 (MTI) 研究集会」/(第321回生存圏シンポジウム), 2016.08.
78. Yoshikawa A. , Fujimoto, A., T. Uozumi, S. Abe, H. Matsushita, and, S. Abe, Space Weather Indexes Produced by ICSWSE/MAGDAS Project, Asia Oceania Geoscience Society 13th Annual Meeting, 2016.07.
79. Matsushita, H., A. Yoshikawa, T. Uozumi, A. Fujimoto, S. Abe, J. K. Ishitsuka, O. Veliz, D. ROSALES, E. SAFOR, V. BETETA, and G. CÁRDENAS, Development Of New Eej Index By Dense Magnetometer Array In Peru, presented at Asia Oceania Geoscience Society 13th Annual Meeting, Asia Oceania Geoscience Society 13th Annual Meeting, 2016.07.
80. Fujimoto, A., T. Uozumi, S. Abe, H. Matsushita, and A. Yoshikawa, Long-term EE-index Variation for Monitoring Equatorial Electrojet Based on ICSWSE Magnetometer Network, Asia Oceania Geoscience Society 13th Annual Meeting, 2016.07.
81. Abe. S, H. Matsushita, Y. Nawata, A. Yoshikawa , Three components analysis of ground magnetometer network data for developing GIC index,13th Annual Meeting Asia Oceania Geoscience Society, Asia Oceania Geoscience Society 13th Annual Meeting, 2016.07.
82. Yoshikawa A., How much curl-free Hall current flows out to the magnetosphere as field-aligned current from Cowling channel?, Chamman Conference on Current in Geospace and Beyond, 2016.05.
83. Yoshikawa A., Shuji Abe, Teiji Uozumi, Akiko Fujimoto, Hiroki Matsushita, Hideaki Kawano, Recent development of MAGDAS project: Strategy for international alliance of geomagnetic field network observation, 日本地球惑星科学連合2016大会, 2016.05.
84. Nakamizo, A. and @A. Yoshikawa,, The Harang Reversal Generated by Ionospheric Polarization Field by Hall Current Divergence, 日本地球惑星科学連合2016大会, 2016.05.
85. Ohtani, S., and @A. Yoshikawa, What if the evolution of auroral forms does not reflect magnetospheric processes?, 日本地球惑星科学連合2016大会, 2016.05.
86. Abe. S, H. Matsushita, Y. Nawata, A. Yoshikawa, , Three components analysis of ground magnetometer network data for understanding GIC excited by space weather disturbances, 日本地球惑星科学連合2016大会, 2016.05.
87. 吉川顕正, 湯元教授の九大での貢献について-観測と教育を中心に-, 電磁圏物理学シンポジウム, 2016.03.
88. 松下拓輝、吉川顕正、魚住禎司、阿部修司、藤本晶子,, ペルー新地磁気観測ネットワークから見た、2015年12月19日発生の磁気嵐時のEEJ構造について, STE現象報告会, 2016.03.
89. 藤本 晶子, 魚住 禎司, 阿部 修司, 松下 拓輝, 吉川 顕正, EE-indexに基 づく赤道地磁気活動の概況報告(2015年9月~2016年3月), 平成 27年度・第2回STE現象報告会, 2016.03.
90. 今城 峻, 吉川 顕正, 魚住 禎司, Shinichi Ohtani,中溝葵, 中低緯度Pi2地磁気脈動に対する朝夕昼夜境界の効果, 電磁圏物理学シンポジウム, 2016.03.
91. Teiji Uozumi, A. Yoshikawa, S. Ohtani, S. Imajo, D. G. Baishev, A. V. Moiseyev, B. M. Shevtsov, and K. Yumoto, Correlated temporal variations of AKR, substorm current wedge and global Pi 2, 平成27年度名古屋大学宇宙地球環境研究所研究集会 「サブストーム研究会」, 2016.02.
92. Matsushita, H, A. Yoshikawa, T. Uozumi, J. Ishitsuka, D. Rosales, O. Veliz, V. B. Alvarado and G. M. Cárdenas, Development of dense magnetometer array in Peru for investigating detailed structure of EEJ, 1st PSTEP International Symposium, 2016.01.
93. Fujimoto, A., A. Yoshikawa, T. Uozumi, S. Abe, and H. Matsushita , Space weather environment index based on ICSWSE magnetometer network, 1st PSTEP International Symposium, 2016.01.
94. 阿部 修司, 吉川 顕正, 魚住 禎司, 藤本 晶子, 松下 拓輝, 縄田 由香利, 九大多磁場観測網を用いた地磁気誘導電流関連研究の展開と展望, 第5回極端宇宙天気研究会, 2015.11.
95. @吉川顕正、花田俊也、羽田亨, 汎地球観測ネットワークを基軸とした 宇宙天気研究・教育の革新的国際展開, 第12回 宇宙環境シンポジウム, 2015.11.
96. Yoshikawa A., Time-dependent generalized Ohm’s Law and formation of global Cowling channel in the ionosphere, 14th International Symposium on Equatorial Aeronomy (ISEA), 2015.10.
97. Babatunde Rabiu, O.O.Folarin, T. Uozumi, N.S.Abdul-Hamid, A.Yoshikawa,, Longitudinal variation of Equatorial Electrojet and the Occurrence of its Counter Electrojet, 14th International Symposium on Equatorial Aeronomy (ISEA), 2015.10.
98. @吉川顕正、花田俊也、山岡均、羽田亨, 宇宙科学教育の国際的展開, 第59回宇宙科学技術連合講演会, 2015.10.
99. @吉川顕正, 磁気圏電離圏結合の理論的研究, 第138回 地球電磁気・地球惑星圏学会総会・講演会(2015年 秋学会), 2015.10, 強磁場弱電離気体系である電離圏と、無衝突系 である磁気圏との相互作用の結果生じる磁気圏電 離圏結合系には、係わる現象の多彩さや複雑さか ら多くの未解明問題が残されている。 本研究ではこのような系で現象実現機構をシステムとして理解する事の重要性を世界に先駆けて明らかにしてきた。 さらに、理論的手法を中心に多圏間結合システム の本質的理解を強く希求する研究を積み上げ、磁気圏及び非等方的な伝導性 をもつ電離圏における磁気流体波動と、中性大気 及び固体地球での電磁波動が結合した多圏間結合 系を定式化し、そのシステム解が Hall 効果によって強くコントロールされることを発見すると ともに、その物理的メカニズムを世界で初めて明 らかにした。本講演では演者がこれまでに構築してきた多圏間結合物理学の理論体系、それからえられる様々な物理現象について紹介する。.
100. @吉川顕正, International alliance of geomagnetic field network observation, 第138回 地球電磁気・地球惑星圏学会総会・講演会(2015年 秋学会), 2015.10.
101. @吉川顕正, (B,V)で俯瞰する磁気圏電離圏結合, 第138回 地球電磁気・地球惑星圏学会総会・講演会(2015年 秋学会), 2015.10.
102. 阿部 修司, 魚住 禎司, 松下 拓輝, 藤本 晶子, 河野 英昭, 吉川 顕正,, MAGDAS project and its new policy for data sharing, 第138回 地球電磁気・地球惑星圏学会総会・講演会(2015年 秋学会), 2015.10.
103. 藤本 晶子, 魚住 禎司, 阿部 修司, 今城 峻, 松下 拓輝, 吉川 顕正, Solar cycle variation of Equatorial Electrojet based on the EE-index, 第138回 地球電磁気・地球惑星圏学会総会・講演会(2015年 秋学会), 2015.10.
104. 今城 峻, 吉川 顕正, 魚住 禎司, Ohtani Shinich, 中溝 葵, , 低緯度朝側昼夜境界付近で観測されるPi2型地磁気脈動と湾型磁場変動, 第138回 地球電磁気・地球惑星圏学会総会・講演会(2015年 秋学会), 2015.10.
105. Aoi Nakamizo, Akimasa Yoshikawa, Harang discontinuity and ionospheric polarization field by Hall current divergence, 第138回 地球電磁気・地球惑星圏学会総会・講演会(2015年 秋学会), 2015.10.
106. Yoshikawa A., MAGDAS Network, Space Weather, and Geomagnetic Storms, A Conference on “Scientific Frontiers: Serving the Peripheries in Times of Change”, 2015.09.
107. Yoshikawa A., Description of Magnetosphere-ionosphere coupling with Alfven waves, Olaf Amm Memorial Workshop, 2015.09.
108. Yoshikawa A., The Magnetosphere-Ionosphere Coupling, International School on Equatorial and Low-Latitude Ionosphere, ISELLI, 2015.09.
109. #Imajo S., A. Yoshikawa, T. Uozumi, S. Ohtani, A. Nakamizo, P. J. Chi, Nature of dayside ionospheric current system of Pi2 Pulsations: Comparison between equivalent currents and numerical simulation, AOGS12th Annual Meeting, 2015.08.
110. 吉川 顕正, ICSWSE/ MAGDAS Research Project-極域-磁気赤道域電磁結合系の探査, 日本地球惑星科学連合2015年大会, 2015.05.
111. 吉川 顕正, ICSWSE/ MAGDAS Projectに於ける国際宇宙天気キャパシティ・ビルディング, 日本地球惑星科学連合2015年大会, 2015.05.
112. 佐々木 晶, @吉川 顕正, 宇宙惑星科学における国際協力:過去・現在・将来, 日本地球惑星科学連合2015年大会, 2015.05.
113. 羽田 亨, 吉川 顕正 , ICSWSEとSTELの連携についての展望, 日本地球惑星科学連合2015年大会, 2015.05.
114. Gopalswamy Nat, 吉川 顕正, 国際宇宙天気イニシアチブ プロジェクト(ISWI), 日本地球惑星科学連合2015年大会, 2015.05.
115. CHI, Peter, YOSHIKAWA, Akimasa, MANN, Ian,, International collaboration in ground based magnetometer observations via ULTIMA: A tribute to Professor Kiyohumi Yumoto, 日本地球惑星科学連合2015年大会, 2015.05.
116. #松下 拓輝, 吉川 顕正, 魚住 禎司, Dp2イベント時の極域から磁気赤道域にかけてのグローバル電離圏電流系の特徴, 日本地球惑星科学連合2015年大会, 2015.05.
117. 秋本 開成, 藤本 晶子, 吉川 顕正, 魚住 禎司, 阿部 修司, MAGDASネットワークによって観測された高速太陽風条件下での磁気赤道Pc 5の特徴, 日本地球惑星科学連合2015年大会, 2015.05.
118. #今城 峻, 吉川 顕正, 魚住 禎司, 大谷 晋一, 中溝 葵, Chi Peter, Pi2型地磁気脈動の昼間側電離層電流系: 等価電流系と数値計算の比較, 日本地球惑星科学連合2015年大会, 2015.05.
119. 阿部 修司, 魚住 禎司, 松下 拓輝, 藤本 晶子, 河野 英昭, 吉川 顕正, MAGDASプロジェクトと新しいデータ共有ポリシー, 日本地球惑星科学連合2015年大会, 2015.05.
120. 今城 峻, 吉川 顕正, 魚住 禎司, 大谷 晋一,中溝 葵, 湯元清文,, 昼間側Pi2型地磁気脈動の等価電流分布と夜側FACの作る電離層電流系, 平成27年度IUGONET研究集会, 2015.05.
121. Estelle, Dirand, Akimasa Yoshikawa, Computer simulation on formation of ionospheric current system accompanied by the incidence of shear Alfvén waves to the ionosphere, United Nations/Japan for Space Weather Symposium, 2015.03.
122. Akimasa Yoshikawa, ICSWSE/MAGDAS project, United Nations/Japan for Space Weather Symposium, 2015.03,
.
123. Kiyohumi Yumoto, Akimasa Yoshikawa, Hideaki Kawano, S. Abe, T. Uozumi, M. Grace, G. Maeda, Recent developments from ICSWSE/MAGDAS Research Project, AGU fall meeting, 2014.12.
124. Akimasa Yoshikawa, Hideaki Kawano, S. Abe, T. Uozumi, M. Grace, G. Maeda, ICSWSE MAGDAS project, National school on Space and Earth Electromagnetism(SEE) 2014, 2014.12.
125. Uetsuhara T, Akimasa Yoshikawa, T. Uozumi, Spatial-temporal response of space debris distribution to geomagnetic storms, 第136回 地球電磁気・地球惑星圏学会総会・講演会(2014年 秋学会), 2014.11.
126. 北川 雄一郎, 河野 英昭, Mann Ian R, Milling David, 林 幹治, 北村 健太郎, Akimasa Yoshikawa, FLR周波数自動検出と、それによる磁気圏プラズマ質量密度の緯度経度構造の統計解析, 第136回 地球電磁気・地球惑星圏学会総会・講演会(2014年 秋学会), 2014.11.
127. 上谷 浩之, Akimasa Yoshikawa, オーロラストリーマの移動に伴う磁気圏-電離圏結合対流の変動, 第136回 地球電磁気・地球惑星圏学会総会・講演会(2014年 秋学会), 2014.11.
128. Nakamizo A, Akimasa Yoshikawa, S. Ohtani, S. Imajo, A. Ieda, K. Seki, A new idea for the equatorial electric field asymmetries based on the global polarization effect, 第136回 地球電磁気・地球惑星圏学会総会・講演会(2014年 秋学会), 2014.11.
129. Akimasa Yoshikawa, T. Uozumi, A. Nakamizo, S.Ohtani, R. Fujii, Alfven wave in the weakly ionized system, 第136回 地球電磁気・地球惑星圏学会総会・講演会(2014年 秋学会), 2014.10.
130. Akimasa Yoshikawa, Hideaki Kawano, Shuji Abe, T. Uozumi, M. Grace, G. Maeda, Space Science Capacity Building at International Center for Space Weather Science and Education (ICSWSE), United Nations / Austria Symposium on “Space Science and the United Nations”, 2014.09.
131. 吉川 顕正, Magnetosphere-Ionosphere Coupling through Alfven Wave, SCOSTEP/ISWI International Space Science School (ISSS) in Peru, SCOSTEP/ISWI International Space Science School (ISSS) in Peru, 2014.09.
132. 吉川 顕正, Technical Presentation on the International Center for Space Weather Science and Education (ICSWSE) of Kyushu University, Geomagnetic Workshop in Medan (North Sumatra, Indonesia), 2014.09.
133. 吉川 顕正, Theory of Cowling channel formation by reflection of shear Alfven waves from the auroral Ionosphere, AGU Chapman Conference on Low-Frequency Waves in Space Plasmas, 2014.08, Cowlingチャンネルとは電離圏に於けるHall電流が電気伝導度勾配領域において発散成分をもつことによって生じる分極電場により、2次的に励起されるHall電流によって誘導された電流系の総称であり、本来のHall電流と2次的なHall電流が同方向に流れる事により、オーロラジェット電流や、赤道ジェット電流等の強力に強調されたジェット電流効果を生み出す基本メカニズムを内包していることは良く知られている。しかしながら、このジェット電流効果を定量的にコントロールするHall電流発散の電離圏内への閉じ込め効率、Hall電流がどれくらいの割合で電離圏内に閉じ込められ、どれくらいの割合で磁気圏に沿磁力線電流として流出するのか?それによってどれくらいの強さの2次的分極電場が生成され、どの程度ジェット電流効果が生み出されるのか?という問題が理論的にも観測的にも不明なままであった。本論文では、沿磁力線電流を形成するshear Alfven waveと相互作用するHall電流系の発散部分を一意に決定する理論枠組を構築し、Hall電流の電離圏内閉じ込め効率の定式化を初めて行う事により、電離圏で最もダイナミックに変動するジェット電流系の定量的解析を可能とする道筋を示したマイルストーン的な論文である。.
134. Akimasa Yoshikawa, A. Nakamizo, S.Ohtani, Y. Tanaka, ICSWSE/ MAGDAS Project: 極域-磁気赤道域電磁結合系の実証的研究, Japan GeoScience Union Meeting 2014, 2014.05.
135. Akimasa Yoshikawa, 電離層電流の地電流電磁的結合:非一様・非等方性伝導度の効果, Japan GeoScience Union Meeting 2014, 2014.05.
136. 河野 英昭, Akimasa Yoshikawa, 魚住 禎司, 阿部 修司, Cardinal Maria Gracita, 前田 丈二, 湯元 清文, VarSITIプログラム期間における国際宇宙天気科学・教育センター/MAGDASの研究プロジェクト, Japan GeoScience Union Meeting 2014, 2014.04.
137. 吉川 顕正, 磁気圏電離圏結合(異プラズマ結合システム:宇宙天気と太陽物理への一般物理の応用), 太陽研連シンポジウム 「活動極大期を迎えた太陽研究の新たな展開、彩層プラズマ診断、宇宙天気、Solar-C」, 2014.02.
138. Akimasa Yoshikawa, Technical presentation on the “International Center for Space Wather Science and Education”, Kyushu University, 第52回国連宇宙平和利用委員会, 2014.02.
139. A. Nakamizo, Akimasa Yoshikawa, Shinichi Ohtani, Akimasa Ieda, Kanako Seki, Rotation of the ionospheric electric potential caused by spatial gradients of ionospheric conductivity, AGU General Assembly 2013, 2013.12.
140. Akimasa Yoshikawa, On formation of Global Cowling channel in the ionosphere and the generalized Ohm’s Law, AGU General Assembly 2013, 2013.12.
141. G. Maeda, Akimasa Yoshikawa, S. Abe, Progress of the MAGDAS Project During 2013, AGU General Assembly 2013, 2013.12.
142. Cardinal, M.G, Akimasa Yoshikawa, Hideaki Kawano, Huixin Liu, Masakazu Watanabe, S. Abe, T. Uozumi, G. Maeda, Tohru Hada, Kiyohumi Yumoto, Capacity building activities at ICSWSE, SCOSTEP, International CAWSES-II meeting, 2013.11.
143. G. Maeda, Kiyohumi Yumoto, Hideaki Kawano, Akimasa Yoshikawa, Huixin Liu, Masakazu Watanabe, S. Abe, T. Uozumi, A. Ikeda, Cardinal, M.G, MAGDAS activities of year 2013, SCOSTEP, International CAWSES-II meeting, 2013.11.
144. S. Abe, Akimasa Yoshikawa, Hideaki Kawano, T. Uozumi, A. Ikeda, Cardinal, M.G, G. Maeda, Kiyohumi Yumoto, Rebuild of data distribution service for MAGDAS/CPMN project
, SCOSTEP, International CAWSES-II meeting, SCOSTEP, International CAWSES-II meeting, 2013.11.
145. 中溝 葵, 吉川 顕正, Ohtani Shinichi, 家田 章正, 関 華奈子, Effects of Hall-Pedersen ratio and conductivity gradients on the rotation of ionospheric electric field potential, 第134回SGEPSS 総会及び講演会, 2013.11.
146. 今城  峻, 吉川 顕正, 魚住 禎司, Marshall Richard, Shevtsov Boris M., 湯元 清文, Pi 2型地磁気脈動に対する日の出境界の効果, 第134回SGEPSS 総会及び講演会, 2013.11.
147. 吉川 顕正, 中溝 葵, Ohtani Shinichi, 弱電離気体系に於ける一般化された3次元オームの法則と分極電場生成について, 第134回SGEPSS 総会及び講演会, 2013.11.
148. 松下 拓輝, 吉川 顕正, 魚住 禎司, Ohtani Shinichi, Characteristic of longitudinal profile of dayside equatorial DP2 oscillation, 第134回SGEPSS 総会及び講演会, 2013.11.
149. 魚住 禎司, 吉川 顕正, Ohtani Shinichi, Baishev Dmitry, 阿部 修司, 河野 英昭, 湯元 清文, Substorm current wedge model for Pi 2 pulsation revisited with middle-latitude MAGDAS and the Polar UVI data, 第134回SGEPSS 総会及び講演会, 2013.11.
150. Akimasa Yoshikawa, Modeling of 3-fluid dynamic and generalized Ohm’s law for understanding ionospheric dynamics, JSPS Core-to-Core Program, 2013 ISWI and MAGDAS Africa School, 2013.09.
151. Akimasa Yoshikawa, MAGDAS/CPMN Project, UN/Austria Symposium on “Space Weather Data, Instruments and Models: Looking Beyond the International Space Weather Initiative, 2013.09.
152. G. Maeda, Kiyohumi Yumoto, Hideaki Kawano, Akimasa Yoshikawa, A. Ikeda, T. Uozumi, Huixin Liu, S. Abe, Masakazu Watanabe, Cardinal, M.G, MAGDAS Activities in Australia Since 2005, AOGS Annual meeting, 2013.06.
153. Magdi Elfadil Yousif Suliman, 吉川 顕正, 魚住 禎司, 湯元 清文, Remotely sensed of some parameters of the solar wind via a low-latitude Pc 5 index, 2013年度日本地球惑星科学連合大会, 2013.05.
154. Maria Gracita Cardinal, 吉川 顕正, 河野 英昭, 渡辺 正和, LIU HUIXIN, Shuji Abe, Teiji Uozumi, George Maeda, Tohru Hada, MAGDAS capacity building activities at ICSWSE, 2013年度日本地球惑星科学連合大会, 2013.05.
155. 今城 峻, 吉川 顕正, 魚住 禎司, 大谷 晋一, 湯元 清文, 朝側で観測される東西偏波Pi 2の性質, 2013年度日本地球惑星科学連合大会, 2013.05.
156. 吉川 顕正, R1電流系と結合した赤道ジェット電流の電流保存について, 2013年度日本地球惑星科学連合大会, 2013.05.
157. 寺田 直樹, 吉村 令慧, 大塚 雄一, 小川 泰信, 神田 径, 櫻庭 中, 塩川 和夫, 篠原 育, 清水 久芳, 高橋 幸弘, 成行 泰裕, 藤井 郁子, 三好 由純, 山本 裕二, 吉川 顕正, SGEPSS将来構想検討ワーキンググループ, 地球電磁気学・地球惑星圏科学の現状と将来(1) − 地球電磁気学・地球惑星圏科学の科学課題, 2013年度日本地球惑星科学連合大会, 2013.05.
158. 松下 拓輝, 吉川 顕正, 魚住 禎司, 池田 昭大, DP2の伝播特性による電離圏電流の同定, 2013年度日本地球惑星科学連合大会, 2013.05.
159. 田中 良昌, 行松 彰, 佐藤 夏雄, 堀 智昭, 吉川 顕正, 才田 聡子, 極域電離圏等価電流系の季節変化, 2013年度日本地球惑星科学連合大会, 2013.05.
160. 細川 敬祐, 吉川 顕正, 小川 泰信, IMAGE FUV と SuperDARN による沿磁力線電流分布の導出, 2013年度日本地球惑星科学連合大会, 2013.05.
161. 関 華奈子, 三好 由純, 天野 孝伸, 齊藤 慎司, 宮下 幸長, 堀 智昭, 大村 善治, 海老原 祐輔, 能勢 正仁, 加藤 雄人, 家田 章正, 梅田 隆行, 齊藤 実穂, 北村 成寿,, 中溝 葵, 瀬川 朋紀, 篠原 育, 松本 洋介, 中野 慎也, 吉川 顕正, ERG理論・モデリング・総合解析班およびERGサイエンスセンター現状報告, 2013年度日本地球惑星科学連合大会, 2013.05.
162. 高橋 幸弘, 吉川 顕正, 清水 久芳, SGEPSS将来構想検討ワーキンググループ, 地球電磁気学・地球惑星圏科学の現状と将来(2)-人類活動を支える知識基盤の構築, 2013年度日本地球惑星科学連合大会, 2013.05.
163. Akimasa Yoshikawa, M-I couping theory, ECLAT Project Meeting, 2nd Project Review Graz, 2013.04.
164. Akimasa Yoshikawa, Current Closure from Polar to Equatorial Ionosphere via Cowling Channel,, EGU General Assembly 2013, 2013.04.
165. Akimasa Yoshikawa, State-of-art in 3D Ionosphere and internal ionospheric dynamics effect on M-I coupling, ISSI Forum "Near Earth Electro-magnetic Environment (Swarm and Cluster), 2013.04.
166. 吉川 顕正, 強磁場弱電離気体系に於ける電流クロージャー:Hall電流時空間非一様性がもたらすもの, 日本物理学会第68回年次大会「プラズマ宇宙物理3学会合同セッション」, 2013.03.
167. Akimasa Yoshikawa, Analogy of Magnetosphere-Ionosphere coupling and Corona-chromosphere-photosphere coupling, ISSI Workshop on "Standing MHD Waves", 2013.02.
168. Akimasa Yoshikawa, Technical presentation on the “International Center for Space Wather Science and Education”, Kyushu University, 第50回国連宇宙平和利用委員会, 2013.02.
169. 吉川 顕正, Cowling チャンネルの物理, 「国立極地研究所研究集会:極域電磁圏構造の非線形発展」, 2013.02.
170. 吉川顕正, Cowlingチャンネル形成の理論, 国立極地研究所研究集会:極域電磁圏構造の非線形発展(観測と理論的アプローチの協働を目指して), 2012.12.
171. Akimasa Yoshikawa, Formation of Cowling channel from Polar to Equatorial Ionosphere, the 2012 AGU Fall Meeting, 2012.12.
172. 吉川顕正, Illustration of Cowling channel coupling to the shear Alfven wave, 第35回極域宙空圏シンポジウム, 2012.11.
173. 吉川 顕正, MI結合の理論的側面から見たEISCAT_3Dへの期待, EISCAT研究集会:北極・北欧における観測・研究戦略, 2012.11.
174. 吉川 顕正, 将来構想の施策まとめに関するパネルディスカッション 1, 第132回 地球電磁気・地球惑星圏学会総会・講演会, 2012.10.
175. 高橋幸弘, 吉川 顕正, SGEPSS 将来構想検討ワーキンググループ,太陽地球系科学の現状と科学課題 4:地球惑星圏における人類活動を支える知識基盤の構築, 第132回 地球電磁気・地球惑星圏学会総会・講演会, 2012.10.
176. Akimasa Yoshikawa, Extraction of polarization field and magnetospheric impedance from the M-I coupled system via shear Alfven wave, 第132回 地球電磁気・地球惑星圏学会総会・講演会, 2012.10.
177. Akimasa Yoshikawa, Aoi Nakamizo, Shin Ohtani, Teiji Uozumi, Y. Tanaka, Formation of FAC -Cowling channel connecting from polar to equatorial ionosphere, 第132回 地球電磁気・地球惑星圏学会総会・講演会, 2012.10.
178. Aoi Nakamizo, Akimasa Yoshikawa, T. Hori, A. Ieda, Y. Hiraki, K. Seiki, Y. Miyoshi, T. Kikuchi, Y. Ebihara, The Response of the Dayside Equatorial Electrojet to Step-like Changes of IMF Bz, 第132回 地球電磁気・地球惑星圏学会総会・講演会, 2012.10.
179. Run Shi, Huixin Liu, Akimasa Yoshikawa, 1D simulation of Electron acceleration by Inertial Alfven wave pulse, 第132回 地球電磁気・地球惑星圏学会総会・講演会, 2012.10.
180. Akimasa Yoshikawa, Establishment of International Center fot Space Science and education, United Nations/Ecuador Workshop on the International Space Weather Initiative (20th Workshop of the United Nations Basic Space Science Initiative), 2012.10.
181. Akimasa Yoshikawa, Modeling of 3D Sq current system, JSPS Core-to-Core Program, 2012 ISWI and MAGDAS School on Space Science, 2012.09.
182. Akimasa Yoshikawa, Opening of International Space Wather Science and Education, UN/Austria Symposium on Space Weather Data Analysis, 2012.09.
183. 吉川 顕正, Ryoichi Fujii, Olaf Amm, Heikki Vanhamakki, On the importance of the Cowling/polarization mechanism for the electrodynamics of the ionosphere and magnetosphere, 2012年度日本地球惑星科学連合大会, 2012.05.
184. 吉川 顕正, Shin Ohtani, 中溝葵, 魚住禎司, Kiyohumi Yumoto, 極域から磁気赤道域にかけて形成されるCowlingチャンネル, 2012年度日本地球惑星科学連合大会, 2012.05.
185. 吉川 顕正, 細川 敬祐, 小川 泰信, 電離圏に於ける入反射Alfven 波の分離, 2012年度日本地球惑星科学連合大会, 2012.05.
186. 吉川 顕正, 魚住禎司, 湯元 清文, Sq電流系に於ける3次元カウリングチャンネルモデル, 2012年度日本地球惑星科学連合大会, 2012.05.
187. 湯元 清文, 吉川 顕正, 河野 英昭, LIU HUIXIN, 渡辺 正和, 池田 昭大, 前田丈二, 阿部修司, 魚住禎司, 宇宙天気研究キャパシティ・ビルディング(能力強化)のための拠点形成について, 2012年度日本地球惑星科学連合大会, 2012.05.
188. 吉川顕正, 磁気圏電離圏チュートリアル, 第26回大気圏シンポジウム, 2012.03.
189. 吉川顕正, 理論的観点から見た電離圏・磁気圏結合, 国立天文台研究集会「太陽彩層と地球電離圏の接点」研究会, 2012.01.
190. Yoshikawa A, A new method for describing the Cowling channel coupling to the FAC system via shear Alfven wave: Conjugate Hall current analysis, AGU-Fall meeting, 2011.12.
191. 吉川顕正, New method for describing theCowling channel coupling to the FAC system via shear Alfven wave: Conjugate Hall current analysis, 地球電磁気・地球惑星圏学会,第130回総会・講演会, 2011.11.
192. Yoshikawa A, A new method for describing the Cowling channel coupling to the FAC system via shear Alfven wave: Conjugate Hall current analysis, Workshop on Physical Processes in Non-Uniform Finite Magnetospheric Systems-50 Years of Tamao's Resonant Mode Coupling Theory, 2011.09.
193. 吉川顕正, A new method for describing the Cowling channel coupling to the FAC system via shear Alfven wave: Conjugate Hall current analysis, NICT/STEL共催 2011年度中間圏・熱圏・電離圏(MTI)研究集会, 2011.08.
194. Yoshikawa A, Geomagnetic Distrbances, ISWI/MAGDAS school on Litho-Space Weather, 2011.08.
195. Yoshikawa A, Principle of Geomagnetism, ISWI/MAGDAS school on Litho-Space Weather, 2011.08.
196. Yoshikawa A, A self-consistent formulation for the evolution of ionospheric conductances at the ionospheric E-region within an M-I coupling scheme, AGU Chapman conference on Relationship Between Auroral Phenomonology and Magnetospheric processes, 2011.03.
197. 吉川顕正, Cowling研究からみた二次元ポテンシャルソルバーの留意点, 平成22年度名古屋大学太陽地球環境研究所研究集会「GEMSIS-太陽、磁気圏、電離圏ワークショップ2010:ジオスペースにおける多圏間相互作用と高エネルギー粒子生成・消滅機構」, 2010.12.
198. 吉川顕正, Cowlingチャンネル生成に伴う伝導度分配機構, 平成22年度国立極地研究所研究集会「極域における電離圏パラメータの非線形発展:モデル化と検証」, 2010.12.
199. 吉川顕正, Cowlingチャンネル研究の展開, 平成22年度名古屋大学太陽地球環境研究所研究集「EISCAT研究集会, 2010.12.
200. 田中良昌、小川泰信、宮岡宏、海老原祐輔、吉川顕正、才田聡子、A. T. Weatherwax, 2009 年11 月にトロムソで観測された準定常オーロラパッチ, 平成22年度名古屋大学太陽地球環境研究所研究集「EISCAT研究集会, 2010.12.
201. 吉川顕正, 電流キャリア遷移過程を考慮した電気伝導度発展方程式の考察, 第34回極域宙空圏シンポジウム, 2010.12.
202. 吉川 顕正, 中溝 葵, 魚住 禎司,田中 良昌, 大谷 晋一, 磁気圏電離圏結合系に於ける電流キャリア遷移過程を考慮した電気伝導度モデリングとその帰結, 地球電磁気・地球惑星圏学会,第128回総会・講演会, 2010.11.
203. Yoshikawa A, Hall Conjugate Analysis for extraction of Cowling Channel, FMI-Invitation seminar, 2010.09.
204. Yoshikawa A, Generalized Cowling Channel in the global ionosphere, FMI-Invitation seminar, 2010.08.
205. Yoshikawa A., O Amm, H Vanhamäki, and R Fujii, Formation of Cowling Channel through the Inductive MI-Coupling Process, 2010 Western Pacific Geophysics Meeting, 22–25 June 2010 
Taipei, Taiwan , 2010.06.
206. Y.-M. Tanaka, Y. Ebihara, S. Saita, and A. Yoshikawa, Magnetosphere-ionosphere coupling process for poleward moving auroral arcs, 2010 Western Pacific Geophysics Meeting, 22–25 June 2010 
Taipei, Taiwan , 2010.06.
207. Yoshikawa A., and S Ohtani, On the Harang-discontinuity type ionospheric potential field deformation derived from the multi- functional ionospheric potential solver, 2010 Western Pacific Geophysics Meeting, 22–25 June 2010 
Taipei, Taiwan , 2010.06.
208. 吉川 顕正, Alfven波をつうじたMI結合系でのCowling-channelの形成, 日本地球惑星連合2010年大会, 2010.05.
209. 吉川 顕正, 多機能型電離圏ポテンシャルソルバーによって導出された電離圏対流変形の要因分離:ハラング連続性の考察, 日本地球惑星連合2010年大会, 2010.05.
210. 田中 良昌、 吉川 顕正, 極域における磁気圏電離圏結合過程, 日本地球惑星連合2010年大会, 2010.05.
211. Yoshikawa A., O Amm and R Fujii, Formation of Cowling Channel through the MI-Coupling Process via Shear Alfven Wave, EGU Spring meeting, 2010.05.
212. Y. Yamazaki, K. Yumoto, H. Terada, Y. Kakinami, T. Uozumi, S. Abe, A. Yoshikawa and CPMN Group, Empirical Sq field model obtained from the 210°MMCPMN data during 1996-2007, AGU Fall meeting, 2009.12.
213. Yoshikawa A, The α- and β-current separation of MI-coupled system using Whalen-relation and Hall conjugate current analysis, AGU Fall meeting, 2009.12.
214. 吉川顕正, 低高度MHD擾乱からのCowling-channel抽出手法の開発, The 33rd Symposium on Space and Upper Atmospheric Sciences in the Polar Regions, 2009.11.
215. Yamazaki Y., K. Yumoto, T. Uozumi, and A. Yoshikawa, Long-term Sq variation in the 210 magnetic meridian region, URSI/COSPAR INTERNATIONAL REFERENCE IONOSPHERE WORKSHOP, 2009.11.
216. 吉川顕正, 一般化Cowling効果の記述と電離圏対流の変形, 第5回 磁気圏-電離圏複合系における対流に関する研究会, 2009.10.
217. 吉川顕正, 田中良昌,中田裕之, 中溝葵, 磁気圏電離圏結合電流系の包括的記述と理解:Alfvenic-coupling をベースとしたアプローチ, 第126回 SGEPSS総会および講演会, 2009.09.
218. 田中良昌,吉川顕正, アルフェン波を介在したオーロラ帯の磁気圏電離圏結合, 第126回 SGEPSS総会および講演会, 2009.09.
219. 中田裕之, 吉川顕正, Global MHD simulation using Alvenic-coupling algorithm (Yoshikawa algorithm), H21年度名古屋大学太陽地球環境研究所「太陽地球惑星系統合型モデル・シミュレータ構築に向けた研究集会」, 2009.08.
220. 吉川顕正, Hall 共役電流法によるAlfvenic MI-coupling系のα・β channel separation, H21年度名古屋大学太陽地球環境研究所「太陽地球惑星系統合型モデル・シミュレータ構築に向けた研究集会」, 2009.08.
221. 徳永旭将, 吉川顕正、湯元清文, 宇宙天気研究のための時系列データマイニングの応用~動的・へテロなシステムからの知識発見, H21年度名古屋大学太陽地球環境研究所「太陽地球惑星系統合型モデル・シミュレータ構築に向けた研究集会」, 2009.08.
222. 吉川顕正, グローバルシミュレーションの為の一般化Alfvenic MI-couplingアルゴリズム, JST/CREST「リアルタイム宇宙天気シミュレーションの研究」チーム成果発表会, 2009.08.
223. Yoshikawa A, Alfvenic-coupling algorithm for analysis of FAC system, The workshop on large-scale field-aligned current systems and associated processes in the magnetosphere and ionosphere, 2009.07.
224. 吉川顕正, 磁気圏電離圏結合に於けるHall電流の発散により生成された分極場の役割, 日本地球惑星科学連合2009年大会, 2009.05.
225. 山崎洋介, 湯元清文, 吉川顕正, Annual and Semi-annual Variations of Equivalent Sq Current System along the 210 MM, 日本地球惑星科学連合2009年大会, 2009.05.
226. 徳永旭将, 吉川顕正, 魚住禎司, 樋口知之,中村和幸,湯元清文, Pi 2 型地磁気脈動の生成・伝播機構解明に関する知見獲得のための独立成分分析の応用, 日本地球惑星科学連合2009年大会, 2009.05.
227. 吉川顕正, 磁気圏電離圏結合における Hall 電流発散の役割, 平成20年度名古屋大学太陽地球環境研究所研究集会, 2009.03.
228. Tokunaga T., A. Yoshikawa, T. Uozumi, K. Yumoto, MAGDAS Group, Convolutive Blind Source Separation of Pi 2 magnetic pulsations observed on the ground, International Symposium: Fifty Years after IGY - Modern Information Technologies and Earth and Solar Sciences , 2008.11.
229. Yoshikawa A., A. Nakamizo, and T. Tanaka, Electromagnetic MI-coupling algorithm through magnetic shear and compression flow for Global M-I coupled Simulation, Michigan-Japan Space Science Workshop, 2008.11.
230. 吉川顕正, 地上多点ネットワークデータの活用:MAGDAS/ CPMNデータの料理の仕方, 第107回生存圏シンポジウム/SGEPSS波動分科会「磁気圏および宇宙空間のプラズマ波動の観測と理論」, 2008.10.
231. 徳永 旭将, 吉川顕正, 魚住 禎司, 湯元 清文 , 地上多点同時観測されたPi 2型地磁気脈動への独立成分分析の適用–時空間混合モデル, 第124回 SGEPSS総会および講演会, 2008.10.
232. 中溝葵, 吉川顕正, The realization of substorm processes by the eigenmode decomposition method in global MHD simulations, 第124回 SGEPSS総会および講演会, 2008.10.
233. 吉川顕正, 陣英克, 三好勉信, 魚住禎司、藤井良一, 宮原三郎, 糸長雅弘, 湯元清文, Separation of Sq current system into Cowling-Electrojet current channel using Hall conjugate current analysis, 第124回 SGEPSS総会および講演会, 2008.10.
234. 寺田大師, 吉川顕正, 藤本晶子, 魚住禎司, 湯元清文, ULTIMAで求めた電離層Sq電流系の太陽風電場依存性, 第124回 SGEPSS総会および講演会, 2008.10.
235. 山崎洋介, 湯元清文, 吉川顕正, 亘慎一,歌田久司, SFE*s observed at Dip-equator CPMN stations: Characteristics and possible mechanisms, 第124回 SGEPSS総会および講演会, 2008.10.
236. 山崎洋介, 湯元清文, 吉川顕正, 亘慎一,歌田久司, SFE*s observed at Dip-equator CPMN stations: Characteristics and possible mechanisms, 第124回 SGEPSS総会および講演会, 2008.10.
237. 平山有紀, 湯元清文, 魚住禎司, 吉川顕正, Nighttime and Daytime Equatorial Pi 2 Pulsations Observed at the MAGDAS/CPMN Stations MAGDAS/CPMN, 第124回 SGEPSS総会および講演会, 2008.10.
238. 吉川顕正, 磁気圏電離圏間の対流・電流・物質流結合, 第2回GEMISISワークショップ, 2008.08.
239. 吉川顕正, 内部境界条件に於ける誘導効果とBrの処理:仮想モノポールの取り扱いについて, STE研究集会「太陽地球/惑星系統合型モデル・シミュレータ構築に向けた研究集会, 2008.08.
240. Tokunaga T., A. Yoshikawa, T. Uozumi, K. Yumoto, Quantitative evaluations of substorm- associated Pi 2 magnetic pulsations observed at dayside equatorial latitudes by means of ICA, 第32回極域宙空圏シンポジウム, 2008.08.
241. Yamazaki Y, K. Yumoto, A. Yoshikawa, S. Watari and H. Utada, SFE*s Observed at Dip-equator CPMN Stations, 第32回極域宙空圏シンポジウム, 2008.08.
242. Yoshikawa A, Formation of Cowling channel in the global ionosphere, 第32回極域宙空圏シンポジウム, 2008.08.
243. Tokunaga, T., A. Yoshikawa, T. Uozumi., and K. Yumoto, The Relationship Between the Two- dimensional Distribution Characteristics of Global Mode Pi 2 Pulsations Extracted by ICA and Auroral Breakups, AOGS 2008 meeting, 2008.06.
244. Yoshiawa A., Uozumi, T., and K. Yumoto,, 3D-Cowling Channel Model in the Sq Current System,, AOGS 2008 meeting, 2008.06.
245. 中溝葵, 吉川顕正, 磁気圏非定常MHD過程とその磁気圏-電離圏結合過程, 日本地球惑星科学連合2008年大会, 2008.05.
246. 吉川顕正, 魚住禎司, 糸長雅弘, 湯元清文, Cowling効果同定の為のHall共役電流法の開発, 日本地球惑星科学連合2008年大会, 2008.05.
247. T. Tokunaga, A. Yoshikawa, T. Uozumi, K. Yumoto, CPMN Group, The two-dimensional distribution of global mode Pi 2 pulsations extracted by Independent Component Analysis and the position of auroral breakup, 日本地球惑星科学連合2008年大会, 2008.05.
248. YAMAZAKI Y., K. YUMOT, A. YOSIKAWA, S. ABE, A. IKEDA, T.A TOKUNAGA, Y. NUMATA, S. WATARI, H. UTADA and Y. KIYOHUMI , Characteristics of SFEs observed at the dip-equator CPMN stations, 日本地球惑星科学連合2008年大会, 2008.05.
249. 平山有紀,湯元清文,魚住禎司,吉川顕正,MAGDAS/CPMN Group, Nighttime and Daytime Equatorial Pi 2 Pulsations Observed at the MAGDAS/CPMN Stations, 日本地球惑星科学連合2008年大会, 2008.05.
250. 池田昭大,湯元清文,魚住禎司,篠原学,野崎憲朗 吉川顕正,塩川和夫, Characteristics of Pi2 electric and magnetic pulsations observed at the low-latitude CPMN magnetometers and a FM-CW radar, 日本地球惑星科学連合2008年大会, 2008.05.
251. Yoshikawa A.,, Hall conjugates current analysis for extraction of Cowling effect from nonuniform-anisotropically conducting ionospheric current system, EISCAT International Symposium, 2008.03.
252. 吉川顕正、魚住禎司、三好勉信、公田浩子、平野隆、糸長雅弘、湯元清文顕正, Sq研究の新展開, 第3回ジオスペース環境科学研究会, 2008.03.
253. A. Yoshikawa, Hall conjugates current analysis for extraction of Cowling effect from nonuniform-anisotropically conducting ionospheric current system, EISCAT International Symposium, 2008.03.
254. 吉川顕正, Sq-EEJ電流系の三次元結合モデル, STE研究所研究集会 『第4回 磁気圏-電離圏複合系における対流に関する研究会』, 2007.11.
255. 吉川顕正, 公田浩子, 川野圭子,魚住禎司, 藤井良一, 宮原 三郎,湯元 清文, 3D-Cowling Channel Model in the Sq Current System, 第122回地球電磁気・地球惑星圏学会, 2007.09.
256. A. Yoshikawa, 3D-Cowling effect in the Sq current system, ISSI teams meeting for "Ionosphere-magnetosphere coupling and induction effects in a three-dimensional ionosphere model", 2007.09.
257. A. Yoshikawa, Cowling channel formation model in the 3d-ionosphere, , IAGA at the IUGG General Assembly 2007, 2007.07.
258. Ikeda A.,M.Shinohara,A.Yoshikawa,K.Nozaki,A.Shinbori, K.Yumoto, Change in Ionospheric Electric Field and Geomagnetic Field due to Solar Wind Variations at the time of SC, IAGA at the IUGG General Assembly 2007, 2007.07.
259. Tokunaga T., H. Kohta, A. Yoshikawa, T. Uozumi, H. Kawano, K. Yumoto and CPMN/MAGDAS Group,, Independent Component Analysis of Nightside Magnetospheric Forced Pi2 Oscillations ovserved at the CPMN Stations, 日本地球惑星科学連合大会, 2007.05.
260. 吉川顕正, 川野圭子, 魚住禎司, 公田浩子, 宮原三郎, 湯元清文, 3次元電離圏におけるCowling Channelの形成モデル, 日本地球惑星科学連合大会, 2007.05.
261. 吉川顕正, 磁気嵐シミュレータ検討会からの報告, 名古屋大学太陽地球環境研究所研究集会, 2007.03.
262. 吉川顕正, 磁気嵐シミュレータの方向性について, 名古屋大学太陽地球環境研究所研究集会, 2007.02.
263. Hiroko KOHTA, Akimasa YOSHIKAWA, Teiji UOZUMI, Kiyohumi YUMOTO, Monitoring of Ionosphere-Atmosphere Electrodynamic Coupling by Geomagnetic Network Data, AGU Fall Meeting, 2006.12.
264. T. Tokunaga, H. Kohta, A. Yoshikawa, T. Uozumi, H. Kawano, K. Yumoto, Global Wave characteristics of Pi 2 Pulsations Extracted by Independent Component Analysis, AGU Fall Meeting, 2006.12.
265. 中田裕之, 吉川顕正, 田中高史, 改良した磁気圏電離圏結合アルゴリズムを用いたグローバルMHDシミュレーション, 地球電磁気・地球惑星圏学会第120回講演会, 2006.11.
266. 公田浩子、吉川顕正、魚住禎司、湯元清文、MAGDAS/CPMNグループ, MAGDAS/CPMNによるSqダイナミクス特性, 地球電磁気・地球惑星圏学会第120回講演会, 2006.11.
267. 吉川 顕正, New coupling algorithm for global magnetosphere-ionosphere- thermosphere coupling simulation, 地球電磁気・地球惑星圏学会第120回講演会, 2006.11.
268. A. Ikeda, M. Shinohara, A. Yoshikawa, K. Nozaki, K. Yumoto, Comparison of the ionospheric electric field and the geomagnetic field at the time of SC, Future Perspectives of Space Plasma and Particle Instrumentation and International Collaborations, 2006.11.
269. H. Kohta, A. Yoshikawa, T. Uozumi, K. Yumoto and MAGDAS/CPMN Group, Some Features of Sq Dynamics Analyzed by MAGDAS/CPMN Data, Future Perspectives of Space Plasma and Particle Instrumentation and International Collaborations, 2006.11.
270. T. Tokunaga, A. Morikawa, H. Kohta, A. Yoshikawa, T. Uozumi, K. Yumoto and MAGDAS/CPMN group, Comparison between High-Latitude Pi 2 Pulsations Extracted by ICA (Independent Component Analysis) and AKR, Future Perspectives of Space Plasma and Particle Instrumentation and International Collaborations, 2006.11.
271. 吉川 顕正, Spatio-temporal development of ionospheric current system and its relation to atmospheric waveguide modes, 幕張メッセ国際会議場, 2006.05.
272. 公田 浩子、吉川 顕正、魚住 禎司、湯元 清文, CPMNデータ解析に基づくSq中心の変動と沿磁力線電流・赤道ジェット電流の関係, 地球惑星科学関連学会合同大会, 2006.05.
273. 徳永 旭将、公田 浩子、吉川 顕正、魚住 禎司、河野 英昭、湯元 清文、環太平洋地磁気観測グループ, 独立成分分析によって抽出されたグローバルなPi2型地磁気脈動の波動特性について, 地球惑星科学関連学会合同大会, 2006.05.
作品・ソフトウェア・データベース等
1. Yoshikawa A., and A. Nakamizo , 宇宙天気概況解析実験マニュアル, 2006.04.
その他の優れた研究業績
2018.01, 最新磁気圏電離圏結合の教科書執筆
「Earth’s Ionosphere: Theory and Phenomenology of Cowling Channels」, in Electric Currents in Geospace and Beyond (eds A. Keiling, O. Marghitu, and M. Wheatland), John Wiley & Sons, Inc, Hoboken, N.J., doi: 10.1002/9781119324522.ch25.
2016.12, 論文名「The initiation of the poleward boundary intensification of auroral emission by fast
polar cap flows: A new interpretation based on ionospheric polarization」のJGR Space Physicsへの出版.
学会活動
所属学会名
日本地球惑星 科学連合
欧州地球物理学連合
国際宇宙空間研究委員会
米国地球物理学連合
地球電磁気・地球惑星圏学会
学協会役員等への就任
2012.06~2020.06, アジア太平洋物理学連合, 活動活性化諮問委員会(Plasma 領域) 委員.
2017.02~2020.03, 地球電磁気・地球惑星圏学会, 学会将来検討委員会委員.
2014.01~2022.01, UN/International Space Weather Initiative (ISWI), 運営委員.
2015.01~2019.12, ICUS, The Scientific Committee on Solar Terrestrial Physics (SCOSTEP), 運営委員.
2014.04~2020.03, 日本地球惑星科学連合(宇宙惑星科学セクショボードメンバー), 幹事.
2014.04~2020.03, 日本地球惑星科学連合(代議員), 代議員(宇宙惑星科学セクション選出).
2011.04~2014.03, 日本地球惑星科学連合, 環境災害対策委員.
2014.04~2017.03, 地球電磁気・地球惑星圏学会, 大林奨励賞推薦委員会委員.
2012.02~2013.03, 地球電磁気・地球惑星圏学会, 学会将来検討委員会委員.
2013.01~2019.03, IUGONET運営協議会, 運営協議会 構成員.
2011.04~2015.03, 地球電磁気・地球惑星圏学会, 運営委員.
2012.02~2014.03, アジア太平洋物理学連合, 活動活性化諮問委員会(Plasma 領域)委員.
2014.04~2015.03, 名古屋大学太陽地球環境研究所, 総合解析委員会委員.
2012.04~2014.03, 名古屋大学太陽地球環境研究所, 総合観測委員会委員.
2009.04~2014.03, 欧州非干渉散乱科学協会, 運営委員.
学会大会・会議・シンポジウム等における役割
2019.05.26~2019.05.30, 日本地球惑星科学連合2019年大会, 「太陽地球系結合過程の研究基盤形成」、convener.
2017.03.13~2017.03.13, シンポジウム「太陽地球系科学に於ける地上観測の現状と課題」, convener, chair.
2018.05.20~2018.05.24, 日本地球惑星科学連合2018年大会, 「太陽地球系結合過程の研究基盤形成」、convener, session chair.
2018.03.22~2018.03.29, Japan-Malaysia Joint Seminar on Space and Earth Electromagnetism 2018, Organizer, Chair of International Steering Committee.
2017.05.20~2017.05.25, 日本地球惑星科学連合2017年大会, 「太陽地球系結合過程の研究基盤形成」、convener, session chair.
2016.11.19~2016.11.23, 第140回地球電磁気・地球惑星圏学「磁気圏電離圏結合セッション座長」, 座長(Chairmanship).
2016.08.02~2016.08.04, AOSG2016, 「Spacer Weather Index session」(session chair) .
2016.05.22~2016.05.26, AGU Chapman Conference on Current in Geospace and Beyond, Chairmanship、プログラム委員.
2016.05.22~2016.05.26, 日本地球惑星科学連合2016年大会, 「太陽地球系結合過程の研究基盤形成」、convener, session chair.
2015.10.19~2016.10.23, 14-th International Symposium on Equatorial Aeronomy (ISEA), プログラム委員.
2015.05.24~2015.05.28, 日本地球惑星科学連合2015年大会, International Collaboration in Planetary and Space Sciences: Small Projects, Big Missions, Everything, convener.
2015.05.24~2015.05.28, 日本地球惑星科学連合2015年大会, 太陽地球結合系の研究基盤形成, convener.
2016.05.22~2016.05.26, 日本地球惑星科学連合2016年大会, 「宇宙惑星科学における国際協力:過去・現在・将来」,コンビナー.
2015.03.02~2015.03.06, UN/JAPAN Workshop on Space Weather Science 2015, International SOC Co-chair, LOC Chair, Session Chair.
2015.03.02~2015.03.06, United nations/Japan Workshop on Space Weather Science, 座長(Chairmanship).
2015.03.02~2015.03.06, United nations/Japan Workshop on Space Weather Science, 座長(Chairmanship)、international SOC Co-chair, LOC-Chair.
2014.12.15~2013.12.19, AGU General Assembly 2014,” Causes of large-scale geomagnetic disturbances, Convener.
2014.12.15~2014.12.19, AGU General Assembly 2014,” Causes of large-scale geomagnetic disturbances”, 座長(Chairmanship).
2014.09.22~2013.09.24, UN/Austria Symposium on “Space Science and the United Nations”, Science Program Committee.
2014.08.31~2014.09.06, AGU Chapman Conference on Low frequency Waves in Space Plasma, 座長(Chairmanship).
2013.11.07~2013.11.09, International Workshop on global ionospheric dynamics II, 主催.
2013.09.23~2013.09.27, UN-ISWI/MAGDAS AFRICA School, コーディネーター(主催)、インストラクター.
2013.09.16~2013.09.20, UN/Austria Symposium on “Space Weather Data, Instruments and Models: Looking Beyond the International Space Weather Initiative, Science Program Committee.
2013.01.04~2013.01.09, International Workshop on global ionospheric dynamics I, 主催.
2012.09.17~2012.09.26, UN-ISWI/MAGDAS INDONESIA School, コーディネーター(主催)、インストラクター.
2011.12.14~2011.12.16, 国立極地研究所研究集会:極域における電離圏パラメータの非線形発展:モデル化と検証II, コンビーナ.
2011.12.14~2011.12.15, 極域における電離圏パラメータの非線形発展:モデル化と検証II, 座長(Chairmanship).
2011.09.12~2011.09.15, Workshop on Physical Processes in Non-Uniform Finite Magnetospheric Systems-50 Years of Tamao's Resonant Mode Coupling Theory, LOC.
2011.09.12~2011.09.15, Workshop on Physical Processes in Non-Uniform Finite Magnetospheric Systems-50 Years of Tamao's Resonant Mode Coupling Theory , 座長(Chairmanship).
2011.08.16~2011.08.19, UN-ISWI/MAGDAS School on Litho-Space Weather, インストラクター.
2010.12.21~2010.12.22, 国立極地研究所研究集会:極域における電離圏パラメータの非線形発展:モデル化と検証, コンビーナ.
2010.12.21~2010.12.12, 極域における電離圏パラメータの非線形発展:モデル化と検証, 座長(Chairmanship).
2010.05.23~2010.05.28, 地球惑星科学関連合同大会2010年度大会, 磁気圏電離圏結合セッションコンビーナ.
2010.03.02~2009.03.05, 第6回ジオスペース研究会, 座長(Chairmanship).
2009.08.04~2008.08.07, 名古屋大学太陽地球環境研究所:太陽地球/惑星系統合型モデル・シミュレータ構築に向けた研究集会, コンビーナ.
2009.08.04~2009.08.07, 名古屋大学太陽地球環境研究所: 太陽地球/惑星系統合型モデル・シミュレータ構築に向けた研究集会, 座長(Chairmanship).
2009.05, 地球惑星科学関連合同大会2009年度大会, 磁気圏電離圏結合セッションコンビーナ.
2009.03.04~2009.03.05, 第5回ジオスペース研究会, 座長(Chairmanship).
2008.08.06~2008.08.08, 名古屋大学太陽地球環境研究所:太陽地球/惑星系統合型モデル・シミュレータ構築に向けた研究集会, コンビーナ.
2008.08.06~2009.08.08, 名古屋大学太陽地球環境研究所: 太陽地球/惑星系統合型モデル・シミュレータ構築に向けた研究集集会, 司会(Moderator).
2008.05, 地球惑星科学関連合同大会2008年度大会, 磁気圏電離圏結合セッションコンビーナ.
2008.03, 第4回ジオスペース研究会, 座長(Chairmanship).
2007.11, ISSI team meeting, 座長(Chairmanship).
2007.09, 名古屋大学太陽地球環境研究所:磁気嵐シミュレータ検討会, コンビーナ.
2007.09, 磁気嵐シミュレータ検討会, 司会(Moderator).
2007.05, 地球惑星科学関連合同大会2007年度大会, 磁気圏電離圏結合セッションコンビーナ.
2007.02, 名古屋大学太陽地球環境研究所:磁気嵐シミュレータ検討会, コンビーナ.
2007.02, 磁気嵐シミュレータ検討会, 司会(Moderator).
2006.08, 名古屋大学太陽地球環境研究所:磁気嵐シミュレータ検討会, コンビーナ.
2006.05, 地球惑星科学関連合同大会2006年度大会, 磁気圏電離圏結合セッションコンビーナ.
2006.03, 磁気嵐シミュレータ検討会, 司会(Moderator).
2005.12, 宇宙プラズマ/太陽系環境研究の将来構想座談会(SSF)4, 座長(Chairmanship).
2005.10, ISSI team meeting , 座長(Chairmanship).
2005.07, The IAGA Scientific Assembly in Toulouse, session convener.
2005.05, 地球惑星科学関連合同大会2004年度大会, 磁気圏電離圏結合セッションコンビーナ.
2005.05, 地球惑星科学関連合同大会2005年度大会, 磁気圏電離圏結合セッションコンビーナ.
2005.05, 地球惑星科学合同大会2005年大会, 座長(Chairmanship).
2005.03, Chapman conference on magnetospheric ULF waves, Program committe, Chair.
2005.03, Chapman conference on magnetospheric ULF waves-Magnetosphere-ionosphere coupling session, 座長(Chairmanship).
2005.03, Chapman conference on magnetospheric ULF waves-Magnetospheric diagonosis session, 座長(Chairmanship).
2004.05, 地球惑星科学関連合同大会2004年度大会, 磁気圏電離圏結合セッションコンビーナ.
2004.05, 地球惑星科学合同大会2004年大会, 磁気圏電離圏結合セッションコンビーナ.
2004.03, CAWSES宇宙天気シンポジウム, 座長(Chairmanship).
2003.05, 地球惑星科学関連合同大会2003年度大会, 磁気圏電離圏結合セッションコンビーナ.
2003.05, 地球惑星科学合同大会2003年大会, 磁気圏電離圏結合セッションコンビーナ.
2002.05, 地球惑星科学関連合同大会2002年度大会, 磁気圏電離圏結合セッションコンビーナ.
2002.05, 地球惑星科学合同大会2002年大会, 磁気圏電離圏結合セッションコンビーナ.
学会誌・雑誌・著書の編集への参加状況
2013.04~2015.03, 地球電磁気・地球惑星圏科学学会会報誌, 国内, 編集委員長.
2013.09~2017.12, Earth, Planet and Space, 国際, 編集委員.
2011.04~2013.03, Earth, Planet and Space, 国際, 運営委員.
学術論文等の審査
年度 外国語雑誌査読論文数 日本語雑誌査読論文数 国際会議録査読論文数 国内会議録査読論文数 合計
2018年度      
2017年度      
2016年度      
2015年度      
2014年度      
2013年度      
2012年度      
2011年度      
2010年度      
2009年度      
2008年度      
2007年度      
2006年度      
2005年度      
2004年度      
2003年度      
2002年度    
その他の研究活動
海外渡航状況, 海外での教育研究歴
ペルー地球物理学研究所, Peru, 2018.12~2018.12.
スリランカ学術会議, SriLanka, 2018.11~2018.12.
BMKG, Indonesia, 2018.09~2018.09.
国連, Austria, 2018.06~2018.06.
USGS観測所, UnitedStatesofAmerica, 2018.11~2018.11.
USGS観測所, UnitedStatesofAmerica, 2018.06~2017.06.
マラ工科大学, Malaysia, 2018.08~2017.08.
ロシア科学アカデミー宇宙線研究所(IKFIA), Russia, 2018.09~2018.09.
ロシア科学アカデミー極東研究所(IKRI), Russia, 2017.06~2017.06.
ノーフォーク国際会議場, UnitedStatesofAmerica, 2017.06~2017.06.
マラ工科大学, マレーシア大学, Malaysia, 2017.08~2017.08.
Universidad Nacional Agraria de la Selva , ペルー地球物理学研究所, Peru, 2017.08~2017.09.
ナイジェリア国立宇宙研究開発機構, Nigeria, 2017.09~2017.09.
ロシア科学アカデミー極東研究所(IKRI), Russia, 2017.09~2017.09.
オーストラリア気象庁, Australia, 2017.12~2017.12.
YAP気象ステーション, Federated States of Micronesia, 2017.12~2017.12.
マラ工科大学, Malaysia, 2017.02~2017.02.
ペルー地球物理学研究所, Peru, 2017.02~2017.03.
インドネシア気象気候地球物理庁(BMKG), Indonesia, 2017.03~2017.03.
ジョンズ・ホプキンズ大学応用物理学研究所, UnitedStatesofAmerica, 2016.01~2016.02.
国際連合本部, Austria, 2016.02~2016.02.
コロンボ大学, SriLanka, 2016.02~2016.02.
国際会議場, Croatia, 2016.05~2016.05.
北京オリンピックセンター, China, 2016.08~2016.08.
ソウル国際会議場, Korea, 2016.08~2016.08.
YAP気象ステーション, Federated States of Micronesia, 2016.09~2016.09.
シャングリ国際会議場, India, 2016.10~2016.10.
ロシア科学アカデミー極東研究所, Russia, 2016.08~2016.08.
モスコーニ国際会議場, UnitedStatesofAmerica, 2016.12~2016.12.
スノーマス国際会議場, UnitedStatesofAmerica, 2015.06~2014.06.
Oulu大学, フィンランド気象研究所, Finland, 2015.08~2015.09.
ナイジェリア国立宇宙研究開発機構, Nigeria, 2015.09~2015.09.
アテネオ大学, マニラ観測所, Philippines, 2015.09~2015.09.
エチオピア大学, Ethiopia, 2015.10~2015.10.
国連ウィーン本部, Austria, 2014.02~2014.02.
ハイアットホテル, Korea, 2014.09~2014.09.
インドネシア気象庁(BMKG), Indonesia, 2014.09~2014.09.
ペルー地球物理学研究所, Peru, 2014.09~2014.09.
オーストリア科学アカデミー, Austria, 2014.09~2014.09.
マレーシア航空宇宙庁, Malaysia, 2014.11~2014.12.
Moscone Center, UnitedStatesofAmerica, 2014.12~2014.12.
国連ウィーン本部, Austria, 2013.02~2013.02.
スイス国際宇宙科学研究所, Switzerland, 2013.02~2013.02.
スイス国際宇宙科学研究所, ウィーン国際会議場, オーストリア科学アカデミー, Switzerland, Austria, 2013.04~2013.04.
オーストリア科学アカデミー, Austria, 2013.09~2013.09.
ココディ大学, , 2013.09~2013.09.
フィンランド気象研究所, Finland, 2013.10~2013.10.
インドネシア地震・気象庁, Indonesia, 2013.10~2013.10.
ジョンズ・ホプキンズ大学 応用物理学研究所, モスコーニコンベンションセンター, UnitedStatesofAmerica, 2013.12~2013.12.
国連ウィーン本部, Austria, 2012.06~2012.06.
スノーマス会議場, UnitedStatesofAmerica, 2012.06~2012.06.
ペルー地球物理学研究所, イカ大学太陽観測所, Peru, 2012.09~2012.09.
オーストリア科学アカデミー, Austria, 2012.09~2012.09.
インドネシア航空宇宙庁, Indonesia, 2012.09~2012.09.
エクアドル外務省, Ecuador, 2012.09~2012.10.
ジョンズ・ホプキンズ大学 応用物理学研究所, モスコーニコンベンションセンター, UnitedStatesofAmerica, 2012.11~2012.12.
アラスカ大学地球物理学研究所, UnitedStatesofAmerica, 2011.02~2011.03.
Redeemers大学, , 2011.08~2011.08.
ジョンズ・ホプキンズ大学 応用物理学研究所, UnitedStatesofAmerica, 2011.10~2011.10.
モスコーンセンター, UnitedStatesofAmerica, 2011.12~2011.12.
ウィーン国際会議場, Austria, 2010.05~2010.05.
台北国際会議場, Taiwan, 2010.06~2010.06.
ハイデラバード国際会議場, India, 2010.07~2010.07.
フィンランド気象研究所, Finland, 2010.08~2010.09.
モスコーンセンター, UnitedStatesofAmerica, 2009.12~2009.12.
Central Queesland University, IPS, CISRO, Australia, Australia, Australia, 2008.03~2008.03.
釜山国際コンベンションセンター, Korea, 2008.06~2008.06.
ミシガン大学, UnitedStatesofAmerica, 2008.11~2008.11.
ペルージャ大学, ヘルシンキ大学, Italy, Finland, 2007.07~2007.08.
スイス国際宇宙科学研究所, Switzerland, 2007.09~2007.09.
サンディエゴ・コンベンションセンター, UnitedStatesofAmerica, 2005.03~2005.03.
ツールース・コンベンションセンター, France, 2005.08~2005.08.
オーストラリア南極庁, Australia, 2005.08~2005.08.
西インド諸島大学, ブラジル宇宙科学研究所, ペルー地球物理学研究所, Trinidad and obaco, Brazil, Peru, 2004.02~2004.02.
kyonhee大学, Korea, 2004.02~2004.02.
アラスカ大学北極圏研究センター, ジョンホプキンス大学応用物理学研究所(APL), UnitedStatesofAmerica, 2003.08~2003.10.
ミネソタ大学, ジョンホプキンス大学, UnitedStatesofAmerica, 2002.03~2003.05.
SFO/Moscone convention center, UnitedStatesofAmerica, 2002.11~2002.11.
ペルー地球物理学研究所, ブラジル宇宙科学研究所, Peru, Brazil, 2002.12~2002.12.
外国人研究者等の受入れ状況
2017.11~2018.05, 1ヶ月以上, Department of Physics, Oulu University, Finland, 学内資金.
2016.10~2017.05, 1ヶ月以上, Department of Physics, Ateneo de Manila University, Program Manager, Upper Atmosphere Dynamics, Manila Observatory, Philippines, 学内資金.
2016.07~2016.09, 1ヶ月以上, National Research Institute of Astronomy and Geophysics (NRIAG), Egypt, 日本学術振興会.
2015.02~2015.08, 1ヶ月以上, ロシア科学アカデミーYu.Gシャファー宇宙物理・超高層大気物理学研究所, Russia, 学内資金.
2014.09~2014.11, 1ヶ月以上, フィンランド気象研究所, Germany, 情報システム研究機構国際交流プログラム“研究者交流”.
2014.03~2014.04, 2週間以上1ヶ月未満, ジョンズ・ホプキンス大学応用物理学研究所, UnitedStatesofAmerica, 学内資金.
2014.03~2014.03, 2週間未満, ナイジェリア宇宙開発事業団, , 日本学術振興会.
2013.10~2013.11, 2週間以上1ヶ月未満, インドネシア航空宇宙庁, Indonesia, 外国政府・外国研究機関・国際機関.
2013.06~2013.08, 1ヶ月以上, パリ先端科学校(グランセコール), France, 外国政府・外国研究機関・国際機関.
2013.01~2013.01, 2週間未満, ジョンズ・ホプキンス大学応用物理学研究所, UnitedStatesofAmerica, 学内資金.
2012.10~2013.10, 2週間未満, ジョンズ・ホプキンス大学応用物理学研究所, UnitedStatesofAmerica, 外国政府・外国研究機関・国際機関.
2012.04~2012.04, 2週間未満, フィンランド気象研究所, Germany, 外国政府・外国研究機関・国際機関.
2011.11~2012.04, 1ヶ月以上, フィンランド気象研究所, Finland, 日本学術振興会.
2010.03~2009.03, 2週間未満, フィンランド気象研究所, Finland, 外国政府・外国研究機関・国際機関.
2009.01~2009.01, 2週間未満, フィンランド気象研究所, Finland, 外国政府・外国研究機関・国際機関.
2008.03~2008.03, 2週間未満, コロラド大学大気海洋研究センター, Japan, 学内資金.
受賞
 田中館賞 , 地球電磁気・地球惑星圏学会, 2015.05.
第一回年九州大学総長賞, 九州大学, 2001.12.
研究資金
科学研究費補助金の採択状況(文部科学省、日本学術振興会)
2016年度~2018年度, 基盤研究(A), 代表, 赤道域地磁気変動の稠密観測に基づく太陽地球環境変動モニタリングシステムの開発.
2018年度~2020年度, 国際共同研究強化(B), 代表, 磁気赤道多点稠密観測に基づく電離圏赤道ジェット電流の面的時空間構造発展の研究.
2018年度~2020年度, 基盤研究(B), 代表, 磁気圏ダイナミクスにおける電離圏能動的役割の探査.
2017年度~2019年度, 基盤研究(B), 代表, 理論・数値実験・データ解析に基づく全球カウリングチャンネルの演繹的・実証的解明.
2017年度~2019年度, 基盤研究(B), 代表, 赤道域地磁気変動の稠密観測に基づく太陽地球環境変動モニタリングシステムの開発.
2016年度~2018年度, 基盤研究(A), 代表, 極域から磁気赤道域を連結する全球Cowlingチャンネルの実証的研究.
2015年度~2019年度, 新学術領域研究, 分担, 地上電磁気圏擾乱現象の発生機構の解明と予測.
2015年度~2017年度, 基盤研究(A), 代表, 衝突系プラズマダイナミクスに基づく全球Cowlingチャンネルの実証的研究.
2012年度~2014年度, 基盤研究(B), 分担, 放射線帯形成を促す内部磁気圏複雑系の創発的特性.
2011年度~2013年度, 基盤研究(C), 分担, 大気大循環モデルと超多点磁場観測データによる大気圏電離圏協調現象の解明.
2010年度~2012年度, 基盤研究(C), 代表, EMF駆動型磁気圏電離圏結合シミュレータによる全球Cowlingチャンネルの解明.
2010年度~2013年度, 基盤研究(A), 分担, 大規模電離圏電流の観測に基づく太陽圏ー磁気圏ー電離圏ー大気圏結合過程の研究.
2008年度~2008年度, 研究成果公開促進費, 分担, マグダス環太平洋地磁気ネットワークデータベース.
2007年度~2007年度, 研究成果公開促進費, 分担, マグダス環太平洋地磁気ネットワークデータベース.
2006年度~2008年度, 基盤研究(A), 分担, 環太平洋ネットワーク観測による宙空領域へのエネルギー・物質流入過程の研究.
2006年度~2006年度, 研究成果公開促進費, 分担, マグダス環太平洋地磁気ネットワークデータベース.
2003年度~2005年度, 若手研究(B), 代表, 沿磁力線電流、Sqダイナモ効果を繰り込りだ電離層電流の全球過渡応答モデルの開発.
2000年度~2001年度, 奨励研究(B), 代表, 磁気圏-電離圏-中性大気-固体地球 電磁気的結合系の理論的研究.
日本学術振興会への採択状況(科学研究費補助金以外)
2016年度~2016年度, JASSO帰国外国人留学生短期研究制度, 代表, MAGDASデータを用いた太陽活動と地殻変動現象の関連性について.
2012年度~2014年度, 研究拠点形成事業 アジア・アフリカ学術基盤形成, 代表, 国際宇宙天気キャパシティビルディングの形成.
2011年度~2012年度, 海外特別研究員, 代表, 磁気圏MHDシミュレータの為の電離圏・大気圏・固体地球系融合結合ソルバーの開発.
競争的資金(受託研究を含む)の採択状況
2013年度~2014年度, 情報システム研究機構国際交流プログラム“国際研究集会開催支援”, 代表, 国際連合・日本合同宇宙天気ワークショップ2015の開催.
2014年度~2014年度, 情報システム研究機構国際交流プログラム“研究者交流”, 代表, 3次元電離圏に於けるCowling チャンネル生成機構の解明.
2013年度~2014年度, (公財)福岡観光コンベンションビューロー国際研究集会助成, 代表, 国際連合・日本合同宇宙天気ワークショップ2015の開催.
2004年度~2009年度, 科学技術振興調整費 (文部科学省), 分担, リアルタイム宇宙天気シミュレーション.
共同研究、受託研究(競争的資金を除く)の受入状況
2019.04~2020.03, 代表, 多様なデータにメタデータを付与できるシステムの開発と複数実データセットへの適用.
2015.04~2016.03, 代表, 超多点地上ネットワーク観測データ解析による電離圏極域-磁気赤道域電磁結合メカニズムの解明.
2016.04~2019.03, 代表, 磁気赤道稠密観測網の 構築によるEEJ研究.
2015.04~2017.03, 代表, 極域3次元磁気圏電離圏結合系の再定式

.
2013.04~2015.03, 代表, 超多点地上ネットワークデータ解析による電離圏極域−磁気赤道域電磁結合メカニズムの解明
.
2012.04~2014.03, 代表, EISCAT/SuperDARNレーダーを用いたCowlingチャンネル検出手法の検討.
2011.04~2012.03, 分担, 極域における電離圏パラメータの非線形発展:モデル化と検証II.
2010.04~2011.03, 代表, 極域における電離圏パラメータの非線形発展:モデル化と検証.
2009.04~2011.03, 代表, Hall共役電流を用いたCowling効果解析手法の開発.
2009.04~2010.03, 代表, 太陽地球/惑星系統合型モデル・シミュレータ構築に向けた研究集会.
2008.04~2009.03, 代表, 太陽地球/惑星系統合型モデル・シミュレータ構築に向けた研究集会.
2006.04~2007.03, 代表, 磁気嵐シミュレータ実現に向けた検討会.
2007.04~2009.03, 代表, 3次元電離圏に於けるCowling Channel形成過程の解明.
2005.04~2006.03, 代表, 磁気嵐シミュレータ実現に向けた検討会.
2005.03~2006.03, 代表, 地上磁場による三次元電流系推定アルゴリズムの開発.
2004.03~2005.03, 代表, サブストーム電流系形成メカニズムの研究.
2002.04~2004.03, 代表, オーロラ形成に於ける発散性ホール電流の役割に関する研究.
2000.04~2002.03, 代表, 極域・磁気赤道域を含む磁気圏-電離圏結合の理論的研究.
寄附金の受入状況
2017年度, MAGDAS/CPMNプロジェクト.
2016年度, テラテクニカ株式会社, MAGDAS/CPMNプロジェクト.
2004年度, 松本研究奨励資金(若手研究者招聘).
学内資金・基金等への採択状況
2016年度~2016年度, スーパーグローバル創成大学支援事業, 代表, 留学生獲得のための海外プロモーション.
2017年度~2018年度, 大学・部局間国際交流協定等推進事業:外国人教員招聘, 代表, Composite study on Magnetosphere-Ionosphere Coupling by using MAGDAS and SWARM satellite.
2015年度~2017年度, 国際宇宙天気科学・教育センター平成25-27年度共同利用研究研究費, 代表, PBI研究の新展開.
2016年度~2017年度, 大学・部局間国際交流協定等推進事業:外国人教員招聘, 代表, Seismoelectromagnetics of the Moro Gulf Quake project.
2015年度~2016年度, 大学・部局間国際交流協定等推進事業:外国人教員招聘, 代表, Studies on global aspects of Storm Sudden Commencement.
2012年度~2014年度, 国際宇宙天気科学・教育センター平成24年度共同利用研究研究費, 代表, International workshop on global ionospheric dynamics.
2013年度~2013年度, 九州大学研究者招聘・派遣プログラム, 代表, 全球結合系に関する論文執筆.
2011年度~2011年度, 宙空環境研究センター平成23年度共同利用研究研究費, 代表, 3次元電離圏に於けるCowling Channel形成過程の解明.
2009年度~2010年度, 宙空環境研究センター平成21-22年度共同利用研究研究費, 代表, 3次元電離圏に於けるCowling Channel形成過程の解明.
2008年度~2008年度, 宙空環境研究センター平成20年度共同利用研究研究費, 代表, 3次元電離圏に於けるCowling Channel形成過程の解明.
2007年度~2007年度, 宙空環境研究センター平成19年度共同利用研究研究費, 代表, 統合型多圏間シミュレータの開発.
2006年度~2006年度, 宙空環境研究センター平成18年度共同利用研究研究費, 代表, 統合型多圏間シミュレータの開発.
2005年度~2005年度, 宙空環境研究センター平成17年度共同利用研究研究費, 代表, サブストーム電流系形成メカニズムの評価.
2004年度~2004年度, 財団法人九州大学後援会国際研究集会派遣助成, 代表, 米国地球物理学連合、Chapman conference(サンディエゴ、カルフォルニア)への出席補助(議長、招待講演).
2004年度~2004年度, 宙空環境研究センター平成16年度共同利用研究研究費, 代表, サブストーム電流系形成メカニズムの評価.
1997年度~1997年度, 九州大学総長特別経費 , 代表, インターネットを通じた大学研究情報公開のあり方に関する研究.

九大関連コンテンツ

pure2017年10月2日から、「九州大学研究者情報」を補完するデータベースとして、Elsevier社の「Pure」による研究業績の公開を開始しました。
 
 
九州大学知的財産本部「九州大学Seeds集」