Authorship：Lead author   Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper (scientific journal)  

Hypomagnesemia is a characteristic adverse event of cetuximab in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC). However, there is limited information about its prevalence, risk factors, and preventive strategies. This study aimed to investigate the risk factors of hypomagnesemia and examine the preventive effects of prophylactic magnesium (Mg) administration. We initially investigated HNC patients treated with cetuximab between 2013 and 2019. Our institute started prophylactic Mg treatment (20-mEq Mg sulfate administration before cetuximab) in practice during this period. We retrospectively assess the preventive efficacy by comparing patients before and after its implementation. In total, 109 patients were included. In 60 patients without prophylaxis, all-grade and grade ≥2 hypomagnesemia at 3 months occurred in 61.7 and 15.0% of patients. The incidence of hypomagnesemia was not affected by regimens and concomitant medications. In 49 patients treated with prophylactic Mg treatment, there was no significant decrease in the cumulative incidence of hypomagnesemia. However, the preventive Mg treatment eliminated the need for additional Mg repletion to maintain Mg levels in patients treated with paclitaxel + cetuximab. A risk factor in patients without prophylaxis was a low Mg level at pre-treatment (≤2.0 mg/dL) (odds ratio: 6.03, 95% confidence interval: 1.78-20.4, p = 0.004), whereas that in patients with prophylaxis was the number of cetuximab doses (≥10) (odds ratio: 5.50, 95% confidence interval: 1.52-19.87, p = 0.009). In conclusion, a low pre-treatment Mg level was the only risk factor that could be avoided by prophylactic Mg administration. This preventive intervention is recommended for managing cetuximab-induced hypomagnesemia.

DOI： 10.1248/bpb.b23-00714

PubMed

Authorship：Lead author   Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper (scientific journal)  

BACKGROUND: Recent advances in immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have highlighted the need for effective management of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). This study aimed to conduct a systematic surveillance of real-world development of irAEs for understanding their characteristics and examine the prognostic impact of steroid use for these events. METHODS: We retrospectively investigated cancer patients treated with ICIs between 2014 and 2021 and collected information about irAEs throughout their development, management, and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Overall, 458 patients (45.4%) developed 670 irAEs. The prevalence of irAEs varied by cancer type, but it was increased in regimens with longer treatment durations. Severe irAEs were more common in the nivolumab + ipilimumab and pembrolizumab + axitinib regimens. Patients who received steroids for irAEs at a dosage of < 2 mg/kg had comparable prognosis to those who did not receive steroids; however, patients who received methylprednisolone pulse therapy, primarily for severe pneumonitis and hepatitis, had shorter overall survival than those who did not receive steroids (7.8 versus 23.4 months, p = 0.016). Furthermore, methylprednisolone pulse therapy for irAEs was a poor prognostic factor in multivariate analysis (hazard ratio: 2.19, 95% confidence interval: 1.34-2.86, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Steroid treatment for irAE does not affect prognosis and should thus be used promptly to control inflammation. However, pulse therapy for severe cases is a poor prognostic factor, and early detection remains the key to managing such irAEs. The irAE characteristics in each regimen should be clarified to establish and provide more sophisticated irAE management, and the current findings will be beneficial to this goal.

DOI： 10.1007/s10147-023-02349-3

PubMed

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper (scientific journal)  

BACKGROUND: Pharmacists must understand the mechanisms by which dispensing errors occur and take appropriate preventive measures. In this study, the gaze movements of pharmacists were analyzed using an eye-tracking method, to elucidate the thinking process of pharmacists when identifying target drugs and avoiding dispensing errors. METHODS: We prepared verification slides and projected them on a large screen. Each slide comprised a drug rack area and a prescription area; the former consisted of a grid-like layout with 55 drugs and the latter displayed dispensing information (drug name, drug usage, location number, and total amount). Twelve pharmacists participated in the study, and three single-type drugs and six double-type drugs were used as target drugs. We analyzed the pharmacists' method of identifying the target drugs, the mechanisms by which errors occurred, and the usefulness of drug photographs using the error-induction (-) /photo (+), error-induction (+) / (+), and error-induction (+) /photo (-) models. RESULTS: Visual invasion by non-target drugs was found to have an effect on the subsequent occurrence of dispensing errors. In addition, when using error-induction models, the rate of dispensing error was 2.8 and 11.1% for the photo (+) and photo (-) models, respectively. Furthermore, based on the analysis of eight pharmacists who dispensed drugs without errors, it was clear that additional confirmation of "drug name" was required to accurately identify the target drug in the photo (+) model; additionally, that of "location number" was required to pinpoint directly the position of target drug in the photo (-) model. CONCLUSIONS: By analyzing the gaze movements of pharmacists using the eye-tracking method, we clarified pharmacists' thinking process which was required to avoid dispensing errors in a complicated environment and proved the usefulness of drug photographs in terms of both reducing the complexity of the dispensing process and the risk of dispensing errors. Effective measures to prevent dispensing errors include ensuring non-adjacent placement of double-type drugs and utilization of their image information.

DOI： 10.1186/s40780-022-00254-x

PubMed

Authorship：Lead author   Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper (scientific journal)   Publisher：Springer Science and Business Media {LLC}  

DOI： 10.1007/s40262-022-01135-0

Scopus

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper (scientific journal)  

Retarded revascularization after progressive occlusion of large conductance arteries is a major cause of bad prognosis for peripheral artery disease (PAD). However, pharmacological treatment for PAD is still limited. We previously reported that suppression of transient receptor potential canonical (TRPC) 6 channel activity in vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) facilitates VSMC differentiation without affecting proliferation and migration. In this study, we found that 1-benzilpiperadine derivative (1-BP), a selective inhibitor for TRPC3 and TRPC6 channel activities, induced VSMC differentiation. 1-BP-treated mice showed increased capillary arterialization and improvement of peripheral circulation and skeletal muscle mass after hind-limb ischemia (HLI) in mice. 1-BP had no additive effect on the facilitation of blood flow recovery after HLI in TRPC6-deficient mice, suggesting that suppression of TRPC6 underlies facilitation of the blood flow recovery by 1-BP. 1-BP also improved vascular nitric oxide bioavailability and blood flow recovery after HLI in hypercholesterolemic mice with endothelial dysfunction, suggesting the retrograde interaction from VSMCs to endothelium. These results suggest that 1-BP becomes a potential seed for PAD treatments that target vascular TRPC6 channels.

DOI： 10.3390/cells11132041

PubMed

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper (scientific journal)  

Neurotoxicity is one of the major side effects caused by calcineurin inhibitors such as tacrolimus in clinical practice. The underlying mechanisms remain unclear, and no potential protective agents have been identified yet. Here, we aimed to investigate tacrolimus-induced neurotoxicity and assess the protective effects of ibudilast, a nonselective phosphodiesterase inhibitor with neuroprotective effects, against tacrolimus-induced neurotoxicity. An in vitro assay of human neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cells showed that ibudilast reduced tacrolimus-induced cell death. Subsequently, using in vivo studies, we assessed the pathological mechanism of neurotoxicity and evaluated the protective effect of ibudilast. Wistar rats were subcutaneously administered tacrolimus (2.5 or 5.0 mg/kg/day) for 14 d, and ibudilast (7.5 mg/kg/day) was intraperitoneally administered once a day beginning 2 d prior to tacrolimus (5 mg/kg/day) administration. We observed that ibudilast significantly reduced the tacrolimus-induced neurotoxic events. From the assessment of excised brains, we found that tacrolimus was penetrated to brain and the brain concentration was correlated with the neurotoxicity-score, although ibudilast had no effect on this pharmacokinetics. Tacrolimus-induced neuronal damage was histopathologically evaluated using Nissl and TUNEL staining, where only the cerebral cortex and CA1 region in hippocampus exhibited neuronal death, but not the CA3 region, dendrite gyrus, and cerebellum. Co-administration of ibudilast significantly attenuated these histopathological changes. In conclusion, these results suggest that tacrolimus translocation into the brain and neuronal damage in the cerebral cortex and CA1 are the underlying mechanisms of tacrolimus-induced neurotoxicity and that ibudilast could be a protective agent against this adverse event.

DOI： 10.1016/j.taap.2022.116112

PubMed

Event date： 2026.2 - 2026.3

Presentation type：Poster presentation  

Event date： 2025.10

Presentation type：Symposium, workshop panel (public)  

Event date： 2025.7

Language：Japanese   Presentation type：Oral presentation (general)  

Event date： 2025.5

Language：Japanese   Presentation type：Public lecture, seminar, tutorial, course, or other speech  

Event date： 2025.4

Language：Japanese   Presentation type：Symposium, workshop panel (nominated)  

Event date： 2024.12

Language：English   Presentation type：Poster presentation  

Event date： 2024.11

Presentation type：Oral presentation (general)  

Event date： 2024.11

Presentation type：Oral presentation (general)  

Event date： 2024.11

Presentation type：Oral presentation (general)  

Event date： 2024.11

Presentation type：Symposium, workshop panel (public)  

Event date： 2024.7

Event date： 2024.7

Event date： 2024.7

Event date： 2024.4

Event date： 2023.11 - 2023.12

Presentation type：Oral presentation (general)  

Event date： 2023.10

Presentation type：Oral presentation (general)  

Event date： 2023.7

Presentation type：Oral presentation (general)  

Event date： 2023.7

Presentation type：Oral presentation (general)  

Event date： 2023.6

Presentation type：Poster presentation  

Event date： 2023.4

Presentation type：Public lecture, seminar, tutorial, course, or other speech  

Event date： 2023.3

Presentation type：Oral presentation (general)  

Event date： 2022.12

Presentation type：Oral presentation (general)  

Event date： 2022.11 - 2022.12

Presentation type：Poster presentation  

Event date： 2022.11

Presentation type：Oral presentation (general)  

Event date： 2022.10

Presentation type：Oral presentation (general)  

Event date： 2022.9

Presentation type：Oral presentation (general)  

Event date： 2021.7

Presentation type：Poster presentation