| HALL ANDREW（ホール アンドリュー） | データ更新日：2023.11.22 |
准教授 ／
比較社会文化研究院
文化空間部門
地球社会統合科学府
| 1. | Andrew Hall, Manchukuo School Textbooks and Identity Formation, 1932-1937, 新世紀人文学論究, 6, 103-124, 2022.02. |
| 2. | Andrew Hall, Japan's Education Policies in Korea in the 1910s: ‘Thankful and Obedient’, Journal of Korean Studies, 10.1215/07311613-7932272, 25, 1, 115-145, 2020.03, [URL], In the 1910s the Japanese colonial officials worked to legitimize their recently acquired rule of Korea through providing public elementary education, gradually expanding from an initially limited offering. Their public schools existed in tension with Korean-run private schools that the Japanese barely tolerated. There was also a tension within the Japanese camp over the proper curriculum for the public elementary schools. The Korean Education Ordinance of August 1911 was a compromise between Japanese officials in Korea, who generally favored a gradual approach to colonial rule, and Japanese educators and officials in Japan, who generally were optimistic about Japan’s ability to assimilate the Koreans through education. The paper expands our understanding of the process of drafting the ordinance, which resulted in an eclectic compromise between the two camps. The article goes on to examine the Japanese “National Language” and “Korean and Literary Sinitic” textbooks published by the government during the 1910s, and finds that this compromise resulted in messages of thankfulness and obedience, as well as messages of Japanese superiority and Korean backwardness. Finally, it reviews the Japanese attempts to control Korean-run private schools. This article explicates the creation and implementation of colonial education policy by examining internal and extremal documents published by the Korea Government-General and its employees, the textbooks the government published, and Japanese education journals. . |
| 3. | Andrew Reed Hall, The Manchukuo education bureaucracy: Japanese New Education reformers and a clash of ideologies, 韓国言語文化研究, 22, 2016.02, Colonial rule in Manchukuo was a chaotic mix of interests and ideologies. Kwantung Army officers, the local Japanese settler community, experienced bureaucrats recently arrived from Japan, and collaborating Chinese all took part in the administration of the state. Although for many years scholars have noted the generative role military officers in the field played in Japanese foreign policy in the 1920s and 1930s, recently they have come to appreciate that the administration of the empire was also disjointed and ad-hoc, rather than centralized and monolithic. The Governors-General of both Taiwan and Korea were both appointed directly by the emperor, and thus enjoyed considerable authority to plan and carry out policies without approval from the Japanese cabinet. Although the Army leadership in Tokyo regained control over the Kwantung Army and won oversight over the puppet state by 1934, day-to-day administration of Manchukuo remained in the hands of the Kwantung Army and its hand-chosen civilian officials. As long as the military retained firm control of the colonies, the Japanese Army allowed the colonial authorities to govern as they saw fit, and even helped to minimize pressures from the civilian segments of the Tokyo government. This paper introduces the nature of the Manchukuo government, and summarizes the history of the state’s education bureaucracy and school structure. Although this chapter focuses on the Japanese policy makers who created the Manchukuo education system, there were also many non-Japanese, particularly Chinese, officials within the education bureaucracy. Unlike in Korea and Taiwan, Manchukuo was established on the premise that the local non-Japanese population created the state and were at the center of its rule. In reality, of course, the Japanese tightly held on to the reigns of power.. |
| 4. | Andrew Reed Hall, First Steps towards Assimilation: Japanese-Run Education in Korea, 1905-1910, Acta Koreana, 18, 2, 357-391, 2015.12, [URL], During the Protectorate era of 1905–1910 Japanese officials in Korea used education as a tool in their attempt to transform the Korean population into a people both friendly and cooperative towards Japan. As Korea was still formally an independent country, these officials could not openly call for assimilation. Yet they systematically worked to leverage the Koreans’ growing passion for education to achieve their goals, through taking over the largely moribund Korean public school system. The public school system had languished with little public or popular support since its creation in 1895, and the Japanese turned it into a well-funded, planned, and staffed elementary school system, with assurance of job placement upon graduation. Many Korean elites, however, feared the loss of sovereignty and the impact on patriotism a Japanese-run system could cause, and a wave of private “patriotic” and Christian school openings resulted. The annexation of Korea in 1910 made Japanese control over public education complete, and increased the pressure on private schools to conform. This article will examine the internal and public writings of the leading Japanese officials in Korea in this period, such as Itō Hirobumi, Shidehara Taira, Tawara Magoichi, Mitsuchi Chūzō to understand their goals and explicate the system they created, including curriculum requirements, the expansion of elementary education, the hiring of Japanese teachers, as well as the suppression of secondary schooling, and the suppression of modern private schools. In particular it will analyze the content of the language textbooks they published.. |
| 5. | Andrew Reed Hall, The Word is Mightier than the Throne: Bucking colonial education trends in Manchukuo, Journal of Asian Studies, 10.1017/S002191180999009X, 68, 3, 895-925, 2009.08, [URL]. |
| 6. | J. Thomas Rimer (editor), “Ikutagawa”, “Shizuka”, “Nanoriso” (introductions and translations of three plays by Mori Ogai). , In Not a Song Like Any Other: An Anthology of Writings by Mori Ogai, edited by J. Thomas Rimer, Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 2004., 2004.01. |
本データベースの内容を無断転載することを禁止します。